Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Gene Repositioning Is Under Constraints After Evolutionary Conserved Gene Neighborhood Separate.

Zhiming Dai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhiming DaiSchool of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes are not randomly distributed on eukaryotic chromosomes. Some neighboring genes show order conservation among species, while some neighboring genes separate during evolution even though their neighborhoods are conserved in some species. Here, I investigated whether after-separation gene repositioning is under natural selection for evolutionary conserved gene neighborhoods compared with nonconserved neighborhoods. After separation, genes with conserved neighborhoods show low-expression divergence between the after-separation species and the before-separation species. After genes separate from their conserved gene neighbors, their after-separation gene neighbors tend to show coexpression and coprotein complex with their before-separation gene neighbors. These results indicate evolutionary constraints on the selection of neighboring genes after evolutionary conserved gene neighborhoods separate.

Indexed as

bioinformaticschromatin regulationgene expressiongenomic neighborsyeast

Identifiers

PMID31632448
PMCPMC6785632
OpenAlexW2978051872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.