Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632209›Full record

ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2019

Use of New Technologies in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Glyn E Jones, Victor A King, Aran Yoo, Amjed Abu-Ghname, Charalambos K Rammos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Glyn E JonesDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois.
Victor A KingDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois.
Aran YooDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois.
Amjed Abu-GhnameDivision of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Charalambos K RammosDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes after mastectomy and prosthetic-based breast reconstruction have improved immensely since the development of the first tissue expander and breast implant in the 1960s. One major factor contributing to our improved outcomes over the past two decades is the increasing availability and improvement of perfusion assessment technology. Instrumental methods now exist which allow surgeons to assess tissue viability intraoperatively, and provide actionable, objective data that augments clinical assessment. In this article, the authors detail two commercially available, state-of-the-art technologies that surgeons may use to assist in mastectomy flap assessment and facilitate the reconstructive process.

Indexed as

hyperspectral imagingimplant-based breast reconstructionindocyanine green fluorescence imaging

Identifiers

PMID31632209
PMCPMC6797494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.