Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632189›Full record

ArticleActa medica Lituanic2019

Successful laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: first experience in Lithuania.

Agnė Laučytė-Cibulskienė, Marius Miglinas, Arūnas Želvys, Albertas Čekauskas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Lituanic, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agnė Laučytė-CibulskienėClinic of Gastronenterology, Nephrourology, and Abdominal Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Marius MiglinasClinic of Gastronenterology, Nephrourology, and Abdominal Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Arūnas ŽelvysClinic of Gastronenterology, Nephrourology, and Abdominal Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Albertas ČekauskasClinic of Gastronenterology, Nephrourology, and Abdominal Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this paper is to share the initial results of LLDN in high-volume university centre that is performing laparoscopic nephrectomies for other indications. MATERIALS AND

methodsDuring 2017, four LLDNs were performed. The transperitoneal approach was used in all cases and the kidney was removed using a suprapubic incision. All donors and recipients were prospectively analysed within six-month follow-up. The patients' clinical, laboratory, and operation-related data were collected from direct interviews with them and from medical records. All patients signed written informed consent.

resultsOne male and three females donated their left kidneys by using the  LLDN technique. The mean age was 58 ±

conclusionsOur initial experience confirms that LLDN is an approach that is easy to learn, especially in a high-volume university hospital with expertise in performing laparoscopic nephrectomies for other indications.

Indexed as

kidney transplantationlaparoscopic nephrectomyliving donortransperitoneal approach

Identifiers

PMID31632189
PMCPMC6779470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.