Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632140›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Prognostic Usefulness Of Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index In Locally-Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients Treated With Radical Chemoradiotherapy.

Erkan Topkan, Huseyin Mertsoylu, Yurday Ozdemir, Ahmet Sezer, Ahmet Kucuk, Ali Ayberk Besen, Ozgur Ozyilkan, Ugur Selek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index in Predicting COPD Exacerbation Risks.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erkan TopkanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-7123
Huseyin MertsoyluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Yurday OzdemirDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Ahmet SezerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6445-1439
Ahmet KucukDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mersin City Hospital, Mersin, Turkey.
Ali Ayberk BesenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Ozgur OzyilkanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Ugur SelekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8087-3140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsPreviously advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has been demonstrated to have prognostic utility in the stratification of patients into distinctive survival groups, but the prognostic value of ALI has never been explored in the setting of locally advanced pancreatic carcinomas (LAPC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Hence, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment ALI in LAPC patients who underwent radical CCRT.

methodsPresent retrospective cohort analysis incorporated 141 LAPC patients who received radical CCRT. Accessibility of baseline ALI cutoff(s) impacting survival outcomes was sought by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Interaction between the ALI and overall- (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) comprised our primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

resultsAt a median follow-up of 14.4 months (range: 3.2-74.2), the median PFS and OS were 7.5 (%95 CI: 5.9-9.1) and 14.6 months (%95 CI: 11.6-17.6), respectively. ROC curve analyses set the ideal ALI cutoff value at 25.3 (AUC: 75.6%; sensitivity: 72.7%; specificity: 70.3%) that exhibited significant associations with both the OS and PFS results. Patient stratification into two groups per ALI [≤25.3 (N=75) versus>25.3 (N=66)] showed that the ALI>25.3 group had significantly superior median OS (25.8 versus 11.4 months; P<0.001) and PFS (15.9 versus 6.0 months; P<0.001) durations than its ALI≤25.3 counterpart. Other factors exhibiting significantly better OS and PFS rates were N

conclusionResults of this hypothesis-generating research proposed the pre-CCRT ALI as a novel robust associate of OS and PFS outcomes for LAPC patients undergoing CCRT.

Indexed as

advanced lung cancer inflammation indexconcurrent chemoradiotherapylocally-advanced pancreas cancerprognosissurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31632140
PMCPMC6789411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.