Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632106›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2019

Bacteria Exploit Autophagy For Their Own Benefit.

Qiuhong Xiong, Min Yang, Ping Li, Changxin Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Autophagy · 2022
    Article
  6. A dynamically evolving war between autophagy and pathogenic microorganisms.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interfering with Autophagy: The Opposing Strategies Deployed byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiuhong XiongInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, People's Republic of China.
Min YangInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, People's Republic of China.
Ping LiInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, People's Republic of China.
Changxin WuInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, People's Republic of China.
Shanxi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a lysosomal degradation pathway to clear long-lived proteins, protein aggregates, and damaged organelles. Certain microorganisms can be eliminated by an autophagic degradation process termed xenophagy. However, many pathogens deploy highly evolved mechanisms to evade autophagic degradation. What is more, series of pathogens have developed different strategies to exploit autophagy to ensure their survival. These bacteria could induce autophagy and/or prevent autophagosomes fusion with lysosomes through secreted effector proteins or utilizing host components, thereby maintaining the localization of the bacteria within the autophagosomes where they replicate. Here, we review the current knowledge of the mechanisms developed by the bacteria to benefit from autophagy for their survival.

Indexed as

autophagybacteriabenefitexploit

Identifiers

PMID31632106
PMCPMC6792943
OpenAlexW2979767110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.