Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31631981›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2019

Patients' Perspective And Usefulness Of Pictograms In Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy - Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Piotr Merks, Damian Świeczkowski, Marcin Balcerzak, Ewelina Drelich, Katarzyna Białoszewska, Natalia Cwalina, Szymon Zdanowski, Jerzy Krysiński, Grażyna Gromadzka, Miłosz Jaguszewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Piotr Merks *Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-3799
Damian Świeczkowski *First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Marcin BalcerzakFarenta Polska sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7828-3325
Ewelina DrelichPiktorex sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna BiałoszewskaDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4266-4916
Natalia CwalinaFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Szymon ZdanowskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9352-0499
Jerzy KrysińskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nicolaus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Grażyna GromadzkaFaculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, Poland.
Miłosz JaguszewskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the practical utility of pharmaceutical pictograms in routine practice in community pharmacy. The primary outcome (composite endpoint) consisted of three elements: i) complete use of the whole package of medication, ii) taking the recommended dose twice a day, and iii) subjective assessment of patients' perspective on medical information about antibiotic therapy obtained during the pharmacy consultation measured by Net Promoter Score in scale from 1 to 10 where 1 is the lowest and 10 the highest possible rating. PATIENTS AND

methodsA multicenter, randomized controlled study was conducted. Community pharmacies (n = 64) which agreed to participate in the study were assigned to one of two groups: i) study - providing an antibiotic with pictograms placed on the external packaging of the medicinal product containing information about drug regimen (n = 32); or ii) control - providing an antibiotic according to usual pharmacy practice (n = 32). Two semi-structured interviews were performed. Data were collected from 199 patients with a mean age ± SD of 45.5 ± 17.0 years.

resultsIn the control group, 15.7% of participants discontinued therapy before using the whole package compared with 13.4% of participants in the study group. In the control group, 81.3% of patients reported that they always took the medication twice a day as recommended by their healthcare providers compared with 80.4% of patients in the study group. The Net Promoter Score was higher for pharmacy practice with than without pictograms (71.3% vs 51.5%, respectively,

conclusionThe pharmaceutical pictograms are readily accepted by patients and could prove to be a valuable support for pharmacists in conducting pharmaceutical care. Further representative research is needed to evaluate the true effectiveness of this solution.

Indexed as

adherence to treatmentantibiotic therapypatient perspectivepharmaceutical carepharmacistpictogramssatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31631981
PMCPMC6778732
OpenAlexW2977596472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.