Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31631888›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2019

Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Aminu Bello, Deenaz Zaidi, Branko Braam, Mark Courtney, Jodi Glassford, Kailash Jindal, Scott Klarenbach, Julia Kurzawa, Mohammed Osman, Nairne Scott-Douglas and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lessons Learned: Nephrology Training Program Adaptation in the Time of COVID.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Aminu BelloDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Deenaz ZaidiDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5546-684X
Branko BraamDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mark CourtneyDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Jodi GlassfordAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Kailash JindalDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Scott KlarenbachDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Julia KurzawaDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mohammed OsmanDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Nairne Scott-DouglasAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Sue SzigetyDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Stephanie ThompsonDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Braden MannsDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8823-6127
Brenda HemmelgarnDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Marcello TonelliDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase, many geographically dispersed Canadians have limited access to specialist nephrology care, which tends to be centralized in major urban areas. As a result, many rural/remote-dwellers in Canada experience poor quality of care and related adverse outcomes. It is imperative to develop alternative care delivery mechanisms to ensure optimal health outcomes for all Canadians.

objectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of electronic consultation (eConsult) as a new model for interactions between specialists and primary care providers (PCPs) to improve access to care for patients with CKD.

designThis is a sequential, mixed methods study that will be conducted in 3 phases.

settingThe study will be conducted across the entire province of Alberta, supported by Alberta Kidney Care (formerly, Northern and Southern Alberta Renal Programs [NARP/SARP]). PATIENTS: Patients suffering from CKD will be included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: We will assess the barriers and enablers of implementation and adoption of an e-consultation protocol to facilitate access to care for patients with CKD in Alberta with a focus on rural/remote-dwellers with CKD. We will also evaluate the impact of the eConsult system (eg, improved access to specialist care, reduction in care gaps), assess the feasibility of province-wide implementation, and compare eConsult with practice facilitation versus eConsult alone in terms of access to specialist care, quality of care, and related outcomes.

methodsThe study will be conducted in 3 phases. In phase 1, we will assess the perceptions of stakeholders (ie, PCPs, nephrologists, patients, policymakers, and other care providers) to improve CKD care delivery, quality, and outcomes in Alberta with focus groups and semistructured interviews. Phase 2 will engage specific family physicians for their input on key factors and logistical issues affecting the feasibility of implementing eConsult for the care of patients with CKD. Phase 3 will provide academic detailing including practice facilitation to clinics in Alberta to assess how eConsult with practice facilitation compares with eConsult alone in terms of access to specialist care, quality of care, and related outcomes.

resultsWe will assess stakeholder perceptions about potential barriers to and enablers of a new eConsult and decision support system strategy, focusing on elements that are most important for the design of a feasible and implementable intervention. We will develop, pilot test, and assess the impact of the eConsult model in improving access to specialist nephrology care and the feasibility of province-wide implementation. The final phase of the project will address key challenges for optimal care for patients with CKD living in rural, remote, and underserved areas of Alberta, particularly timely referral and disease management as well as the cost-effective benefits of eConsult. LIMITATIONS: Lack of high-speed Internet in many rural and remote areas of Alberta may lead to more time spent in completing the eConsult request online versus faxing a referral the traditional way. Allied health care staff (referral coordinators, administrative staff) require training to the eConsult system, and physicians at many remote sites do not have adequate staff to handle eConsult as an added task.

conclusionsImplementation of eConsult can favorably influence referral patterns, access to care, care quality, patient outcomes, and health care costs for people with CKD. Results of this study will inform the optimization of care for rural/remote-dwellers with CKD and will facilitate future partnerships with policymakers and provincial renal programs in Alberta to ensure optimal kidney health for all residents.

trial registrationNot required.

Indexed as

adverse outcomeschronic kidney disease (CKD)decision support system (DSS)e-consultationquality of careremoterural

Identifiers

PMID31631888
PMCPMC6769217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.