Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31631579›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2019

The acute effects of different levels of intermittent negative pressure on peripheral circulation in patients with peripheral artery disease.

Henrik Hoel, Lars Øivind Høiseth, Gunnar Sandbaek, Jon Otto Sundhagen, Iacob Mathiesen, Jonny Hisdal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07291817 (Intermittent Negative Pressure for Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07291817 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Intermittent Negative Pressure for Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers (INPRESS) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLo Zhiwen JosephRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsDiabetic Foot UlcerArmsFlowOx
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik HoelInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1891-1614
Lars Øivind HøisethDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar SandbaekInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jon Otto SundhagenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Iacob MathiesenOtivio AS, Oslo, Norway.
Jonny HisdalInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOOtivio (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intermittent negative pressure (INP) applied to the lower leg induces acute increase in arterial and skin blood flow. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal level of INP to increase blood flow in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). We investigated the acute effects of different levels of INP in 16 subjects (7 women and 9 men, mean (SD) age 71(8) years) diagnosed with PAD. During application of INP in a pressure chamber sealed below the knee, arterial blood flow was continuously recorded in the dorsalis pedis artery or tibialis posterior artery (ultrasound Doppler), and skin blood flow was continuously recorded at the pulp of the first toe (laser Doppler). Different pressure levels (0, -10, -20, -40, and -60 mmHg) were tested in randomized order. Maximal arterial blood flow relative to baseline (median [25th, 75th percentiles]) was: 0 mmHg; 1.08 (1.02, 1.13), -10 mmHg; 1.11 (1.07, 1.17), -20 mmHg; 1.18 (1.11, 1.32), -40 mmHg; 1.39 (1.27, 1.91) and -60 mmHg; 1.48 (1.37, 1.78). Maximal laser Doppler flux (LDF) relative to baseline was: 0 mmHg; 1.06 (1.02, 1.12), -10 mmHg; 1.08 (1.05, 1.16) -20 mmHg; 1.12 (1.06, 1.27), -40 mmHg; 1.24 (1.14, 1.50) and -60 mmHg; 1.35 (1.10, 1.70). There were significantly higher maximal arterial blood flow and maximal LDF at -40 mmHg compared with -10 mmHg (P = 0.001 and P = 0.025, respectively). There were no significant differences in maximal arterial blood flow and maximal LDF between 0 and -10 mmHg (both P = 1.0), or between -40 and -60 mmHg (both P = 1.0). INP of -40 mmHg was the lowest negative pressure level that increased blood flow.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHemodynamicsHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseasePressureRegional Blood FlowSkinUltrasonography, DopplerArterial blood flowintermittent negative pressureperipheral artery diseaseskin blood flow

Identifiers

PMID31631579
PMCPMC6801220
OpenAlexW2982007955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.