Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31631570›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

A new risk score for patients after first recurrence of stage 4 neuroblastoma aged ≥18 months at first diagnosis.

Kiana Kreitz, Angela Ernst, René Schmidt, Thorsten Simon, Matthias Fischer, Ruth Volland, Barbara Hero, Frank Berthold

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Establishment and Validation of a Prognostic Immune Signature in Neuroblastoma.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kiana KreitzInstitute of Medical Statistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Angela ErnstInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
René SchmidtInstitute of Medical Statistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Thorsten SimonDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matthias FischerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ruth VollandDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Barbara HeroDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Frank BertholdDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7613-1723

Funding

Deutsche Krebshilfe 70107712Deutsche Krebshilfe 70-2290-BeDeutsche Krebshilfe 70-443Deutsche Krebshilfe T12/97/Be1German Children's Cancer Foundation 2004.08German Children's Cancer Foundation 2006.10German Children's Cancer Foundation DKS 95.09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of patients with recurrences from stage 4 neuroblastoma is not uniformly dismal. The evaluation of new therapies therefore needs to consider the individual risks of the treated patients. This study aims to define clinically useful risk criteria. PATIENTS AND

methodsInclusion criteria were: first recurrence of neuroblastoma stage 4 aged ≥18 months and enrollment in first line trials between 1997 and 2016. Patients were randomized into a training set (N = 310) and an independent validation set (N = 159). The primary endpoint was secondary event-free survival. The individual treatment elements the patients received during initial and recurrent disease were analyzed as binary and time-dependent variables. A five-step multiple time-dependent Cox regression analysis was performed on the training set to identify prognostic variables adjusted for the individual frontline treatment. The selected variables resulted in a prognostic index (PI) and were used to build a risk score system. The score was validated with the validation set.

resultsOf the 469 patients, 372 were treated with curative intent and 97 with palliative intent. The PI included the variables number of recurrence organs (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.27), time to recurrence (HR = 2.03), liver metastasis at diagnosis (HR = 1.77), first recurrence at site of the primary tumor (HR = 1.55), and age (HR = 1.29). Three risk groups were built and confirmed in the validation set. The scoring system was likewise useful for the curatively or palliatively treated subgroups.

conclusionA new risk score system for patients with first recurrence of stage 4 neuroblastoma aged ≥18 months at diagnosis is proposed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGermanyHumansInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNeuroblastomaPrognosisclinical trialhigh-risk neuroblastomarecurrencerelapserisk scoretime-dependent variable

Identifiers

PMID31631570
PMCPMC6885891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.