ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
CEST MRI quantification procedures for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema therapy evaluation.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- CESTsimu: An open-source GUI for spectral and spatial CEST simulation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Current diagnostic and quantitative techniques in the field of lymphedema management: a critical review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Development and Validation of Four Different Methods to Improve MRI-CEST Tumor pH Mapping in Presence of Fat.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- In vivo lymph node CEST-Dixon MRI in breast cancer patients with metastatic lymph node involvement.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast tumors: a comparative study using amide proton transfer-weighted, diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Investigation of relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement effect at -1.6 ppm in an ischemic stroke model.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Imaging Modalities for Evaluating Lymphedema.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- CEST-MRI for body oncologic imaging: are we there yet?NMR in biomedicine · 2023Review
- Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An Overview of Recent Findings and Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Elevated magnetic resonance imaging measures of adipose tissue deposition in women with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- A Brief History and Future Prospects of CEST MRI in Clinical Non-Brain Tumor Imaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- A comparative study of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of breast cancer.European radiology · 2021Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging and bioimpedance evaluation of lymphatic abnormalities in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Use of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of therapeutic response in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review.Archives of plastic surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo quantify chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast in upper extremities of participants with lymphedema before and after standardized lymphatic mobilization therapy using correction procedures for B
methodsFemales with (n = 12) and without (n = 17) breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) matched for age and body mass index were scanned at 3.0T MRI. B
resultsB
conclusionChemical exchange saturation transfer metrics, following appropriate correction procedures, respond to lymphatic mobilization therapies and may have potential for evaluating treatments in participants with secondary lymphedema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.