Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31631092›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2019

Improvement of developmental competence of cloned male pig embryos by short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) vector-based but not small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated RNA interference (RNAi) of Xist expression.

Xuqiong Yang, Xiao Wu, Yang Yang, Ting Gu, Linjun Hong, Enqin Zheng, Zheng Xu, Fang Zeng, Junsong Shi, Rong Zhou and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Knockdown of YY1 InhibitsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Manipulating the Epigenome in Nuclear Transfer Cloning: Where, When and How.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xuqiong YangNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Xiao WuNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Yang YangNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Ting GuNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Linjun HongNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Enqin ZhengNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Zheng XuNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Fang ZengCollege of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Junsong ShiGuangdong Wens Pig Breeding Technology Co., Ltd., Wens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527400, Guangdong, China.
Rong ZhouGuangdong Wens Pig Breeding Technology Co., Ltd., Wens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527400, Guangdong, China.
Gengyuan CaiNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Zhenfang WuNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
Zicong LiNational Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
South China Agricultural University · CNWen's Food Group (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xist is an X-linked ribonucleic acid (RNA) gene responsible for the cis induction of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). In cloned mammalian embryos, Xist is ectopically activated at the morula to blastocyst stage on the X chromosome that is supposed to be active, thus resulting in abnormal XCI. Suppression of erroneous Xist expression by injecting small interfering RNA (siRNA) remarkably increased the developmental efficiency of cloned male mouse embryos by approximately 10-fold. However, injection of anti-Xist siRNA resulted in only a slight increase in the developmental ability of injected cloned male pig embryos because the blocking effect of the injected siRNA was not maintained beyond the morula stage, which is 5 days post-activation. To develop a more effective approach for suppressing the ectopic expression of Xist in cloned pig embryos, we compared the silencing effect of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and siRNA on Xist expression and the effects of these two Xist knockdown methods on the developmental competence of cloned male pig embryos. Results indicated that an shRNA-based RNA interference (RNAi) has a longer blocking effect on Xist expression than an siRNA-mediated RNAi. Injection of anti-Xist shRNA plasmid into two-cell-stage cloned male pig embryos effectively suppressed Xist expression, rescued XCI at the blastocyst stage, and improved the in vitro developmental ability of injected cloned embryos. These positive effects, however, were not observed in cloned male pig embryos injected with anti-Xist siRNA. This study demonstrates that vector-based rather than siRNA-mediated RNAi of Xist expression can be employed to improve pig cloning efficiency.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCells, CulturedCloning, OrganismEmbryo, MammalianFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Knockdown TechniquesGenetic VectorsMaleNuclear Transfer TechniquesRNA InterferenceRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Small InterferingSwineRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Small InterferingXIST non-coding RNAClonedPigRibonucleic acid interference (RNAi)Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)Xist

Identifiers

PMID31631092
PMCPMC6923154
OpenAlexW2980389677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.