Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630658›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Enhanced self-reported affect and prosocial behaviour without differential physiological responses in mirror-sensory synaesthesia.

Kalliopi Ioumpa, Sarah A Graham, Tommy Clausner, Simon E Fisher, Rob van Lier, Tessa M van Leeuwen

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bridging senses: novel insights from synaesthesia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kalliopi IoumpaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sarah A GrahamLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tommy ClausnerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Simon E FisherDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rob van LierDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tessa M van LeeuwenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mirror-sensory synaesthetes mirror the pain or touch that they observe in other people on their own bodies. This type of synaesthesia has been associated with enhanced empathy. We investigated whether the enhanced empathy of people with mirror-sensory synesthesia influences the experience of situations involving touch or pain and whether it affects their prosocial decision making. Mirror-sensory synaesthetes (

Indexed as

Pain PerceptionTouch PerceptionAdultEmpathyFemaleHormonesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSynesthesiaVisual PerceptionYoung AdultHormonesaltruismempathymirror-pain synaesthesiamirror-touch synaesthesiaprosocial behaviourstress response

Identifiers

PMID31630658
PMCPMC6834009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.