Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630654›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Exploring the relationship between grapheme colour-picking consistency and mental imagery.

Mary Jane Spiller, Lee Harkry, Fintan McCullagh, Volker Thoma, Clare Jonas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bridging senses: novel insights from synaesthesia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary Jane SpillerSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London E14 4LZ, UK.
Lee HarkrySchool of Psychology, University of East London, London E14 4LZ, UK.
Fintan McCullaghSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London E14 4LZ, UK.
Volker ThomaSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London E14 4LZ, UK.
Clare JonasSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London E14 4LZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has indicated a potential link between mental imagery and synaesthesia. However, these findings are mainly based on imagery self-report measures and recruitment of self-selected synaesthetes. To avoid issues of self-selection and demand effects, we recruited participants from the general population, rather than synaesthetes specifically, and used colour-picking consistency tests for letters and numbers to assess a 'synaesthete-like' experience. Mental imagery ability and mental rotation ability were assessed using both self-report measures and behavioural assessments. Consistency in colour-picking for letters (but not numbers) was predicted by performance on the visual mental imagery task but not by a mental rotation task or self-report measures. Using the consistency score as a proxy measure of grapheme-colour synaesthesia, we provide more evidence for the suggestion that synaesthetic experience is associated with enhanced mental imagery, even when participants are naive to the research topic. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Bridging senses: novel insights from synaesthesia'.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionImaginationAdultColorFemaleHumansMaleMental ProcessesMiddle AgedSynesthesiaYoung Adultcolour-picking consistencycrossmodal correspondencesdemand effectsmental imagerymental rotationsynaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID31630654
PMCPMC6834015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.