Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630369›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2020

Maxillary arch dimensions in the first 6 months of life and their relationship with pacifier use.

I Zen, M Soares, L M C P Pinto, A Ferelle, J P Pessan, C C Dezan-Garbelini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The role of craniofacial maldevelopment in the modern OSA epidemic: a scoping review.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I ZenDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-4365
M SoaresDepartment of Oral Medicine and Pediatric Dentistry, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
L M C P PintoDepartment of Oral Medicine and Pediatric Dentistry, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
A FerelleDepartment of Oral Medicine and Pediatric Dentistry, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
J P PessanDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil. juliano.pessan@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-3933
C C Dezan-GarbeliniDepartment of Oral Medicine and Pediatric Dentistry, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-0677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluated the maxillary arch dimensions at birth and 6 months of life, and to verify the influence of pacifier use on palatal development.

methodsMaxillary arch impressions were taken from 80 full-term newborns, appropriate for gestational age, from 24 to 72 h of life, and repeated after 6 months. Anatomical references were mapped on dental casts and measurements were taken. Parents were questioned about feeding practices and sucking habits. Data were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and hierarchical mixed regression model (p < 0.05).

resultsAnterior maxillary segment (median [interquartile range]) presented an increase in transverse (Δ% = 81.90 [74.40-89.70]) and in length (Δ% = 76.20 [49.10-102.70]) relative growth. No differences were detected in palatine depth from birth (11.00 mm [10.30-11.70]) to 6 months (12.60 mm [12.0-13.90]).

conclusionsPacifier use was positively related to the increase in anterior segment length. In the first 6 months of life, the greatest relative growth of the maxillary arch occurs in the anterior region, showing this growth does not occur homogeneously. The use of pacifiers came to influence this process, even before the eruption of the upper incisors.

Indexed as

Dental ArchPacifiersHumansIncisorInfant, NewbornMaxillaPalateMaxillaNewbornPaediatric dentistryPalate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.