Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630345›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

Serial reversal learning in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro).

Martha M M Daniel, Vera Schluessel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The incomparable fascination of comparative physiology: 40 years with animals in the field and laboratory.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visual discrimination and resolution in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martha M M DanielInstitute of Zoology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, Meckenheimer Allee 169, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Vera SchluesselInstitute of Zoology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, Meckenheimer Allee 169, 53115, Bonn, Germany. v.schluessel@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-876X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial reversal learning is considered a reliable approach for the testing of behavioral flexibility, and animals that inhabit fluctuating habitats and different environments are expected to possess behavioral and cognitive flexibility. The ocellate river stingray (Potamotrygon motoro) is one such species. Comprising the first serial reversal learning experiment among elasmobranchs, this study trained seven juvenile P. motoro in a visual two-alternative forced-choice task, in which a food-rewarded stimulus and an unrewarded alternative stimulus were presented in pseudo-random order on either side of a barrier. In the session after a stingray reached the learning criterion (LC), food was associated with the alternative stimulus, and this reward association continued to be switched whenever LC was achieved. Overall, five stingrays reversed successfully at least once. All of them required more sessions (mean = 67.8 sessions) for the first reversal than they needed during training (mean = 22 sessions). One stingray demonstrated progressive improvement across four reversal phases, thus showing that Potamotrygon motoro can inhibit a previously learned association faster with experience, probably as it develops strategies for rule identification. One individual became slower to reach the (LC) across three reversal phases, which may indicate a dominant influence of proactive interference. Another stingray demonstrated large fluctuations across three reversals. The fourth individual completed two reversals and required approximately the same number of sessions for each. One stingray had just completed one reversal by the end of this study. Since stingrays took longer than a related species to reverse learning, future studies could look at the effects of changing stimulus type or training regime on the performance of P. motoro.

Indexed as

ElasmobranchiiSkates, FishAnimalsFresh WaterReversal LearningSerial LearningBehaviorCognitionElasmobranchLearningProgressive improvementVision

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.