Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630344›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

Delayed gratification in New Caledonian crows and young children: influence of reward type and visibility.

Rachael Miller, Anna Frohnwieser, Martina Schiestl, Dakota E McCoy, Russell D Gray, Alex H Taylor, Nicola S Clayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. eLife · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New Caledonian crows plan for specific future tool use.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachael MillerDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. rmam3@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-9571
Anna FrohnwieserDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Martina SchiestlSchool of Psychology, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Dakota E McCoyDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Russell D GraySchool of Psychology, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alex H TaylorSchool of Psychology, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicola S ClaytonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 3399933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-control underlies cognitive abilities such as decision making and future planning. Delay of gratification is a measure of self-control and involves obtaining a more valuable outcome in the future by tolerating a delay or investing a greater effort in the present. Contextual issues, such as reward visibility and type, may influence delayed gratification performance, although there has been limited comparative investigation between humans and other animals, particularly non-primate species. Here, we adapted an automated 'rotating tray' paradigm used previously with capuchin monkeys to test for delay of gratification ability that requires little pre-test training, where the subject must forgo an immediate, less preferred reward for a delayed, more preferred one. We tested New Caledonian crows and 3-5-year-old human children. We manipulated reward types to differ in quality or quantity (Experiments 1 and 2) as well as visibility (Experiment 2). In Experiments 1 and 2, both species performed better when the rewards varied in quality as opposed to quantity, though performed above chance in both conditions. In Experiment 1, both crows and children were able to delay gratification when both rewards were visible. In Experiment 2, 5-year-old children outperformed 3- and 4-year olds, though overall children still performed well, while the crows struggled when reward visibility was manipulated, a result which may relate to difficulties in tracking the experimenters' hands during baiting. We discuss these findings in relation to the role of contextual issues on self-control when making species comparisons and investigating the mechanisms of self-control.

Indexed as

CrowsDelay DiscountingSelf-ControlAnimalsCebusHumansRewardChildrenCorvidsDelayed gratificationSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID31630344
PMCPMC6981108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.