Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630324›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2019

Relationship Between Bariatric Surgery and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Lihu Gu, Bangsheng Chen, Nannan Du, Rongrong Fu, Xiaojing Huang, Feiyan Mao, Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo, Shenbiao Zhao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lihu GuDepartment of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Bangsheng ChenEmergency Medical Center, Ninbo Yinzhou No 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Nannan DuThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Rongrong FuThe First Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaojing HuangThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Feiyan MaoDepartment of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Parikshit Asutosh KhadarooMonash University School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.
Shenbiao ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Ningbo Yinzhou No 2 Hospital, 998 North Qianhe Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, 315100, Zhejiang, China. weihuangyinzhou@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-5615
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNNingbo No. 2 Hospital · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between bariatric surgery (laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [LSG] and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [LRYGB]) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The number of obese patients with newly onset, worsened, or improved GERD after bariatric surgery in each article were extracted. In the pooled analysis, LSG was associated with a higher risk of GERD than LRYGB (odds ratio [OR] = 5.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.60-7.23, p < 0.001). Compared with LSG, LRYGB had a better effect on GERD (OR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.12-0.30, p < 0.001). LRYGB was more effective for treating GERD in obese patients than LSG and the incidence of newly onset GERD after LRYGB was lower.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric BypassGastroesophageal RefluxHumansLaparoscopyObesityPostoperative ComplicationsWeight LossBariatric surgeryGastroesophageal reflux diseaseMeta-analysisRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID31630324
OpenAlexW2981025397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.