Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630259›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2020

A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Masahiko Kawaguchi, Hiroki Iida, Satoshi Tanaka, Naokazu Fukuoka, Hironobu Hayashi, Shunsuke Izumi, Kenji Yoshitani, Manabu Kakinohana, MEP Monitoring Guideline Working Group of the Safety Committee of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA)

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiko KawaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan. drjkawa@naramed-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-4600
Hiroki IidaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Satoshi TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Naokazu FukuokaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
Hironobu HayashiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Shunsuke IzumiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ryukyu, Nishihara, Japan.
Kenji YoshitaniDepartment of Anesthesiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Manabu KakinohanaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ryukyu, Nishihara, Japan.
MEP Monitoring Guideline Working Group of the Safety Committee of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA)
Nara Medical University · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JPGifu University · JPGifu University Hospital · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPShinshu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative motor dysfunction can develop after spinal surgery, neurosurgery and aortic surgery, in which there is a risk of injury of motor pathway. In order to prevent such devastating complication, intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP) has been conducted. However, to prevent postoperative motor dysfunction, proper understanding of MEP monitoring and proper anesthetic managements are required. Especially, a variety of anesthetics and neuromuscular blocking agent are known to attenuate MEP responses. In addition to the selection of anesthetic regime to record the baseline and control MEP, the measures to keep the level of hypnosis and muscular relaxation at constant are crucial to detect the changes of MEP responses after the surgical manipulation. Once the changes of MEP are observed based on the institutional alarm criteria, multidisciplinary team members should share the results of MEP monitoring and respond to check the status of monitoring and recover the possible motor nerve injury. Prevention of MEP-related adverse effects is also important to be considered. The Working Group of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) developed this practical guide aimed to help ensure safe and successful surgery through appropriate anesthetic management during intraoperative MEP monitoring.

Indexed as

AnestheticsEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesAnestheticsAnesthesiaAortic surgeryGuidelineIntraoperative monitoringMotor evoked potentialNeurosurgerySpinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID31630259
OpenAlexW2980620069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.