ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Motion-corrected coronary calcium scores by a convolutional neural network: a robotic simulating study.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and application of artificial intelligence in cardiac imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Fully automated artificial intelligence-based coronary CT angiography image processing: efficiency, diagnostic capability, and risk stratification.European radiology · 2024Trial
- Deep learning for automatic calcium detection in echocardiography.BioData mining · 2024Article
- The Value of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with a High Calcium Score.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2023Article
- DiFiR-CT: Distance field representation to resolve motion artifacts in computed tomography.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Benign incidental cardiac findings in chest and cardiac CT imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Role and progress of artificial intelligence in radiodiagnosing vascular calcification: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- COPD identification and grading based on deep learning of lung parenchyma and bronchial wall in chest CT images.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Classification of moving coronary calcified plaques based on motion artifacts using convolutional neural networks: a robotic simulating study on influential factors.BMC medical imaging · 2021Article
- Status quo and future prospects of artificial neural network from the perspective of gastroenterologists.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Task-dependent estimability index to assess the quality of cardiac computed tomography angiography for quantifying coronary stenosis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Development and multicenter validation of chest X-ray radiography interpretations based on natural language processing.Communications medicine · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in cardiac radiology.La Radiologia medica · 2020Review
- Prediction of outcome of treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis using principal component analysis and artificial intelligence.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Article
- Coronary artery calcium severity grading on non-ECG-gated low-dose chest computed tomography: a multiple-observer study in a nationwide lung cancer screening registry.European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo classify motion-induced blurred images of calcified coronary plaques so as to correct coronary calcium scores on nontriggered chest CT, using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) trained by images of motion artifacts.
methodsThree artificial coronary arteries containing nine calcified plaques of different densities (high, medium, and low) and sizes (large, medium, and small) were attached to a moving robotic arm. The artificial arteries moving at 0-90 mm/s were scanned to generate nine categories (each from one calcified plaque) of images with motion artifacts. An inception v3 CNN was fine-tuned and validated. Agatston scores of the predicted classification by CNN were considered as corrected scores. Variation of Agatston scores on moving plaque and by CNN correction was calculated using the scores at rest as reference.
resultsThe overall accuracy of CNN classification was 79.2 ± 6.1% for nine categories. The accuracy was 88.3 ± 4.9%, 75.9 ± 6.4%, and 73.5 ± 5.0% for the high-, medium-, and low-density plaques, respectively. Compared with the Agatston score at rest, the overall median score variation was 37.8% (1st and 3rd quartile, 10.5% and 68.8%) in moving plaques. CNN correction largely decreased the variation to 3.7% (1.9%, 9.1%) (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) and improved the sensitivity (percentage of non-zero scores among all the scores) from 65 to 85% for detection of coronary calcifications.
conclusionsIn this experimental study, CNN showed the ability to classify motion-induced blurred images and correct calcium scores derived from nontriggered chest CT. CNN correction largely reduces the overall Agatston score variation and increases the sensitivity to detect calcifications. KEY POINTS: • A deep CNN architecture trained by CT images of motion artifacts showed the ability to correct coronary calcium scores from blurred images. • A correction algorithm based on deep CNN can be used for a tenfold reduction in Agatston score variations from 38 to 3.7% of moving coronary calcified plaques and to improve the sensitivity from 65 to 85% for the detection of calcifications. • This experimental study provides a method to improve its accuracy for coronary calcium scores that is a fundamental step towards a real clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.