Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630231›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Impact of integrated multiple image averaging on OCT angiography image quality and quantitative parameters.

Jost L Lauermann, Y Xu, P Heiduschka, M Treder, F Alten, N Eter, M Alnawaiseh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing the Sensitivity of OCT-A Retinal Vasculature Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jost L LauermannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany. jost.lauermann@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-6129
Y XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
P HeiduschkaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
M TrederDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
F AltenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
N EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
M AlnawaisehDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple image averaging (MIA) is a new approach to improve OCT angiography (OCTA) imaging. The aim of this work was to analyze the impact of MIA on image quality and quantitative OCTA parameters.

methodsTwenty eyes from 20 healthy volunteers (55.65 ± 14.8 years) were prospectively enrolled. Imaging was performed using two commercially available OCTA devices (Canon OCT HS-100, Optovue AngioVue) using a uniform imaging protocol. Each participant had two single scans of the macula (3 × 3mm, Canon and Optovue) as well as five continuous single scan imaging procedures (3 × 3mm each) using the Canon device. Three out of five of these images with highest quality were manually chosen and then automatically processed by the Canon device using MIA. The superficial retinal plexus of the single scans and of MIA images was analyzed with regard to the device' own image quality scores (IQS), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), the size of the foveolar avascular zone (FAZ), and vessel density (VD). Image acquisition times were recorded. Parameters were compared between the devices and the different imaging protocols.

resultsAverage acquisition time was significantly higher for the MIA compared with the single measurements (29.09 ± 10.19 seconds (s) (MIA) vs. 5.56 ± 2.17 s (Canon single scan) vs. 20.28 ± 6.81 s (Optovue) (p < 0.001)). IQS showed no significant differences between the devices and between the recording protocols. PSNR was 12.38 ± 0.20 (Canon single scan), 13.01 ± 0.36 (Canon MIA), and 14.34 ± 0.60 (Optovue) (p < 0.001 between the groups). Mean FAZ area in Canon single scans was 0.29 ± 0.06 mm

conclusionsMIA can improve PSNR, but it also reduces imaging speed and significantly affects VD measurements. Therefore, when comparing OCTA data, the use of uniform imaging protocols is required.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultAgedFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHealthy VolunteersHumansMacula LuteaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceImage qualityOptical coherence tomography angiographyRetinal imagingSpectral-domain optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.