SynthesisPsychological research2021
Defining pleasant touch stimuli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Mixed Reality in Oral Surgery Training: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- A neurobiological evaluation of soft touch training for patients with skin-picking disorder.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Trial
- Article
- Affective tactile stimulation ameliorates chronic pain and comorbid anxiety by modulating hippocampal CA1 oscillations and functional connectivity.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
- The emotional responses to the sounds of organic affective tactile gestures.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Characteristics of vicarious touch reports in a general population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Validated Touch-Video Database.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Brain mechanisms for processing caress-like touch in skin-picking disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024Article
- Anticipatory and Consummatory Responses to Touch and Food Rewards: A Protocol for Human Research.Bio-protocol · 2022Article
- Pleasant touch perception in borderline personality disorder and its relationship with disturbed body representation.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2022Article
- Endowing a NAO Robot With Practical Social-Touch Perception.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- Article
- Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pleasantness is generally overlooked when investigating tactile functions. Addition of a pleasant stimulus could allow for a more complete characterisation of somatosensory function. The aims of this review were to systematically assess the methodologies used to elicit a pleasant sensation, measured via psychophysical techniques, and to perform a meta-analysis to measure the effect of brush stroking velocity on touch pleasantness. Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, with five studies included in the meta-analysis. The review found that factors such as texture, velocity, force, and the duration of continuous stroking influence tactile evoked pleasantness. Specifically, using a soft material and stroking at a velocity of 3 cm/s with light force is generally considered as particularly pleasant. The meta-analysis showed that a brush stroking velocity of 30 cm/s was rated as less pleasant than 3 cm/s, on the forearm. The present study collates the factors that are most likely to provide a stimulus to elicit a pleasant sensation. The results should be important for studies requiring a well-defined pleasant stimulus including neurosensory assessment protocols, allowing for a more complete multimodality assessment of somatosensory function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31630220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.