Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630115›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Under the Mind's Hood: What We Have Learned by Watching the Brain at Work.

Anna Christina Nobre, Freek van Ede

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Opening Questions in Visual Working Memory.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Temporal orienting in Parkinson's disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna Christina NobreOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom, and kia.nobre@ohba.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5762-2802
Freek van EdeOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0002-7434-1751

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104571/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imagine you were asked to investigate the workings of an engine, but to do so without ever opening the hood. Now imagine the engine fueled the human mind. This is the challenge faced by cognitive neuroscientists worldwide aiming to understand the neural bases of our psychological functions. Luckily, human ingenuity comes to the rescue. Around the same time as the Society for Neuroscience was being established in the 1960s, the first tools for measuring the human brain at work were becoming available. Noninvasive human brain imaging and neurophysiology have continued developing at a relentless pace ever since. In this 50 year anniversary, we reflect on how these methods have been changing our understanding of how brain supports mind.

Indexed as

PsychophysiologyAttentionBrain MappingCognitionEvoked PotentialsForecastingHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMachine LearningMental ProcessesNeuroimagingNeurophysiologyNeuropsychologyElectroencephalograhy (EEG)Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)Historical overviewHuman brain imagingHuman neurophysiologySelective attention

Identifiers

PMID31630115
PMCPMC6939481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.