Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31630102›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Research protocol for mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation: a prospective controlled multicentre observational study to determine incidence and risk factors of mechanical complications within 24 hours after cannulation.

Maria Adrian, Ola Borgquist, Peter Bentzer, Jonas Åkeson, Martin Spångfors, Jonas Wrigstad, Anders Holmström, Rikard Linnér, Thomas Kander

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03782324 (Mechanical Complications After Central Venous Catheterisation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03782324 completednot on this map

Mechanical Complications After Central Venous Catheterisation

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2019 to 2020Enrolled12,600ConditionsMechanical Complications of Central Venous Catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria AdrianDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skane University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden maria.adrian@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-9665-3692
Ola BorgquistDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skane University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Peter BentzerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas ÅkesonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Martin SpångforsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas WrigstadDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skanes University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Anders HolmströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Rikard LinnérDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Thomas KanderDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skane University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCentral venous catheterisation is a common procedure in intensive care therapy and the use of central venous catheters is essential for treatment of many medical disorders. Although rare, central venous catheterisation is associated with mechanical complications that can be life-threatening if untreated. Real-time ultrasound guidance reduces the incidence of mechanical complications when compared with the anatomic landmark method. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of and potential risk factors associated with early mechanical complications of central venous catheterisation in an era where real-time ultrasound guidance has become clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, controlled, multicentre, observational study. All participating hospitals follow the same clinical guidelines for central venous catheterisation. Each central venous catheter insertion will be recorded in the common electronic chart system according to a recently revised template. An automated script-based search will identify all recorded central venous catheter insertion templates during the study period and relevant variables will be extracted. Outcome measures and independent variables are pre-defined in this study protocol. Multivariable and univariable logistic regression analysis will be used to determine associations and risk factors of mechanical complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, Sweden has approved this study. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03782324.

Indexed as

Multicenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicArrhythmias, CardiacArteriesCatheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersHemorrhageHumansIncidencePeripheral Nerve InjuriesPneumothoraxProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSwedenUltrasonography, Interventionalcentral venous catheterisationcomplicationsfemoral veininternal jugular veinsubclavian vein

Identifiers

PMID31630102
PMCPMC6803156
OpenAlexW2980554416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.