Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31629837›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Patterns and Predictors of Relapse Following Radical Chemoradiation Therapy Delivered Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Rebecca Shakir, Richard Adams, Rachel Cooper, Amy Downing, Ian Geh, Duncan Gilbert, Clare Jacobs, Christopher Jones, Cressida Lorimer, Wanangwa C Namelo and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Optimising chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Factors Influencing Outcomes and Survival in Anal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Impact of dose escalation on colostomy-free survival and treatment outcome in squamous cell anal carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca ShakirOxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard AdamsVelindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Rachel CooperRadiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Amy DowningLeeds Institute for Medical Research at St James, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Ian GehQueen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Duncan GilbertSussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Clare JacobsOxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christopher JonesRadiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Cressida LorimerSussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Wanangwa C NameloVelindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
David Sebag-MontefioreRadiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Paul ShawVelindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom; School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.
Rebecca MuirheadOxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rebecca.muirhead@oncology.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBVelindre Cancer Centre · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19121Cancer Research UK 21133Cancer Research UK 25350Cancer Research UK C8225/A21133Medical Research Council MC_U137686858Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur purpose was to describe the patterns and predictors of treatment failure in patients receiving definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), delivered using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our study was a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients treated with curative intent for ASCC using CRT delivered with a standardized IMRT technique in 5 UK cancer centers. Patients were included from the start of UK IMRT guidance from February 2013 to October 31, 2017. Collected data included baseline demographics, treatment details, tumor control, sites of relapse, and overall survival. Statistical analysis to calculate outcomes and predictive factors for outcome measures were performed using SPSS and R.

resultsThe medical records of 385 consecutive patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 24.0 months. Within 6 months of completing CRT, 86.7% of patients achieved a complete response. Three-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 75.6% and 85.6%, respectively. Of all relapses, 83.4% occurred at the site of primary disease. There were 2 isolated relapses in regional nodes not involved at outset. Predictive factors for cancer recurrence included male sex, high N-stage, and failure to complete radiation therapy as planned.

conclusionsThe treatment results compare favorably to published outcomes from similar cohorts using 3-dimensional conformal CRT. The observed patterns of failure support the current UK IMRT voluming guidelines and dose levels, highlighting our prophylactic nodal dose as sufficient to prevent isolated regional relapse in uninvolved nodes. Further investigation of strategies to optimize CR should remain a priority in ASCC because the site of primary disease remains the overwhelming site of relapse.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalRe-IrradiationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Identifiers

PMID31629837
PMCPMC6961207
OpenAlexW2981075438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.