Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31629726›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

In vitro fertilization and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: associations with treatment parameters.

Barbara Luke, Morton B Brown, Michael L Eisenberg, Caitriona Callan, Beverley J Botting, Allan Pacey, Alastair G Sutcliffe, Valerie L Baker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Incidence of complications amongJournal of medicine and life · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara LukeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Electronic address: lukeb@msu.edu.
Morton B BrownDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Michael L EisenbergDivision of Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Caitriona CallanInstitute of Child Health University College London, London, UK.
Beverley J BottingInstitute of Child Health University College London, London, UK.
Allan PaceyDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Alastair G SutcliffeInstitute of Child Health University College London, London, UK.
Valerie L BakerDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
University College London · GBJohns Hopkins University · USMichigan State University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Assisted Reproductive Technology & Risk of Childhood CancerR01CA151973 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LUKE, BARBARA JOAN, SPECTOR, LOGAN G. · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Assisted Reproduction and Child Health: Risk of Birth Defects, Mortality, and Effect on Grade School PerformanceR01HD084377 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LUKE, BARBARA JOAN · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151973NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough in vitro fertilization has been associated with an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, the association of risk with in vitro fertilization treatment parameters is unclear.

objectiveTo evaluate risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy by maternal fertility status and in vitro fertilization treatment parameters. MATERIALS AND

methodsWomen in 8 states who underwent in vitro fertilization resulting in a live birth during 2004-2013 were linked to their infant's birth certificates. A 10:1 sample of births from non-in vitro fertilization deliveries were selected for comparison. Those with an indication of infertility treatment on the birth certificate were categorized as subfertile and omitted from the study population; all others were categorized as fertile. The in vitro fertilization pregnancies were additionally categorized by oocyte source (autologous versus donor) and embryo state (fresh versus thawed). Both the fertile and in vitro fertilization births were limited to singletons only, and the in vitro fertilization pregnancies were limited to those using partner sperm. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (including gestational hypertension and preeclampsia) were identified from the birth certificate, modeled using logistic regression, and reported as adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. For analyses of in vitro fertilization pregnancies from autologous oocytes-fresh embryos, the reference group was fertile women (subgroup analysis 1). For analyses within the in vitro fertilization group, the reference group was autologous oocytes-fresh embryos (subgroup analysis 2).

resultsThe study population included 1,465,893 pregnancies (1,382,311 births to fertile women and 83,582 births to in vitro fertilization-treated women). Compared to fertile women, in vitro fertilization-treated women with autologous-fresh cycles were not at increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.99, 1.08). Among in vitro fertilization births (subgroup analysis 2), the risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was increased for the autologous-thawed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.20, 1.40); donor-fresh (adjusted oddds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.71, 2.15); and donor-thawed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.47, 1.96) groups. Excluding women with pregestational diabetes or chronic hypertension as well as adjusting for body mass index and infertility diagnoses did not substantially change the results. When stratified by <34 weeks (early-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy) versus ≥34 weeks (late-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy), only the donor-fresh group had an increased risk of early-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but the risks for all other oocyte source-embryo state groups compared to autologous-fresh were increased for late-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

conclusionThe risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is increased for in vitro fertilization-treated women in pregnancies conceived via frozen embryo transfer (with both autologous or donor oocyte) and fresh donor oocyte embryo transfer. No increase in risk was seen with autologous oocyte-fresh embryo transfers in vitro fertilization cycles. Excluding women with pregestational diabetes or chronic hypertension as well as adjusting for body mass index and infertility diagnoses did not substantially change the results.

Indexed as

CryopreservationFertilityAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleFertilization in VitroGestational AgeHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedMiddle AgedOocytesPre-EclampsiaPregnancyRisk FactorsTransplantation, Autologousautologous-freshautologous-thaweddonor-freshdonor-thawedembryo stategestational hypertensioninfertilityin vitro fertilizationoocyte sourcepreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID31629726
PMCPMC7141970
OpenAlexW2981201292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.