ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2020
Development, Validation, and Interpretation of the PROMIS Itch Questionnaire: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for the Quality of Life Impact of Itch.
Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of baricitinib in combination with topical steroids on atopic dermatitis symptoms, quality of life and functioning in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from the BREEZE-AD7 Phase 3 randomized trial.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2021Trial
- Patient-reported Itch Outcome Measures for Chronic Pruritus in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: Exploratory Analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Developing and testing bolt-on enhanced EQ-5D-5L for assessing Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed-methods study protocol.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Article
- Capturing patient-reported sleep disturbance in atopic dermatitis clinical trials.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Evaluating Donor Site Morbidity and Scar Outcomes in Skin Transfer Techniques.Cureus · 2024Review
- Commentary on "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology".American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023Article
- Patient-Reported Outcome Dashboards Within the Electronic Health Record to Support Shared Decision-making: Protocol for Co-design and Clinical Evaluation With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- DESCRIBE-AD: A novel classification framework for atopic dermatitis.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2022Review
- Generation and Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Itch Questionnaire-Child (PIQ-C) to Measure the Impact of Itch on Life Quality.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022Article
- Itch: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic workup.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2022Review
- COVID-19 Public Stigma Scale (COVID-PSS): development, validation, psychometric analysis and interpretation.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Reliability and meaningful change of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemThe British journal of dermatology · 2021Article
- Observational
- Factor analysis of subjective descriptors of chronic pruritus and association with quality of life: A cross-sectional survey.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current patient-reported outcome measures for itch are limited and may not capture its full impact on health-related quality of life. We sought to develop, calibrate, and validate banks of questions assessing the health-related quality of life impact of itch as part of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. A systematic process of literature review, content-expert review, qualitative research, testing in a sample of 600 adults, classical test theory methods, and item response theory analyses were applied. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were followed by item response theory model and item fit analyses. Four itch-related item banks were developed: (i) general concerns, (ii) mood and sleep, (iii) clothing and physical activity, and (iv) scratching behavior. Item response theory and expert content review narrowed the item banks to 25, 18, 15, and 5 items, respectively. Validity of the item banks was supported by good convergent and discriminant validity with itch intensity, internal consistency, and no significant floor or ceiling effects. In conclusion, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Itch Questionnaire banks have excellent measurement properties and efficiently and comprehensively assess the burden of itch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.