Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628684›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020

Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay for detection of respiratory viruses and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in oropharyngeal swab samples from outpatients.

Ying Zhang, Lan Cao, Zhi Xu, Pingting Zhu, Bing Huang, Kuibiao Li, Yang Xu, Zhoubin Zhang, Yong Wu, Biao Di

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mapping the Evolution of Diagnostic Research onPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. A bibliometric analysis of the literature onSouthern African journal of infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  4. PCR sensitivity forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying ZhangGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2666-6575
Lan CaoGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi XuNingbo Health Gene Technologies Co., Ltd, Ningbo, China.
Pingting ZhuGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Bing HuangGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Kuibiao LiGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Yang XuGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Zhoubin ZhangGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Yong WuNingbo Health Gene Technologies Co., Ltd, Ningbo, China.
Biao DiGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

Key Medicine Discipline Construction of Guangzhou Municipality 2017-2019-07National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2017ZX10103011Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Health Department A2017489Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou Health Department 20181A011052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory viruses, such as influenza viruses, initially infect the upper airways but can manifest as severe lower respiratory tract infections in high-risk patients with significant morbidity and mortality. For syndromic diagnosis, several multiplex nucleic acid amplification tests have been developed for clinics, of which SureX 13 Respiratory Pathogen Multiplex Kit (ResP) can simultaneously detect 13 pathogens directly from airway secretion specimens. The organisms identified are influenza virus A, influenza virus A pdmH1N1 (2009), influenza virus A H3N2, influenza virus B, adenovirus, boca virus, rhinovirus, parainfluenza virus, coronavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia.

methodsThis study provides performance evaluation data of this assay by comparing with pathogen-specific PCRs from oropharyngeal swab samples.

resultsTen pathogens were detected in this assay, of which rhinovirus, adenovirus, and influenza virus A pdmH1N1 (2009) were the most common. The overall agreement between the ResP and the comparator tests was 93.8%. The ResP demonstrated 86.5% agreement for positive results and 97.8% agreement for negative results.

conclusionThe ResP assay demonstrated a highly concordant performance comparing with pathogen-specific PCRs for detection of respiratory pathogens in oropharyngeal swabs from outpatients and could aid in the diagnosis of respiratory infections in a variety of clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Pneumonia, MycoplasmaPneumonia, ViralAdenoviridaeAdolescentAdultAmbulatory CareChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfluenza A virusMaleMiddle AgedMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMycoplasma pneumoniaeOropharynxRNA, Viralacute respiratory infectionsinfluenza virus Amultiplex PCRoropharyngeal swabrespiratory virus

Identifiers

PMID31628684
PMCPMC6977335
OpenAlexW2980508805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.