ReviewHeart failure reviews2020
Congestion occurrence and evaluation in acute heart failure scenario: time to reconsider different pathways of volume overload.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration Modalities in the Management of Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome with Diuretic Resistance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Device-driven cyclic compression of the superior vena cava as a preload reduction strategy to improve cardiac function in heart failure: a pilot feasibility study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- COPD-Asthma-Heart Failure Overlap: Optimizing Bronchodilators and ICS in a High-Risk Triad.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Review
- Heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction: a necessary but imperfect partnership.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Advances and controversies in acute decompensated heart failure treatment: beta-blocker roles, emerging devices, and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The Role of Lung Ultrasound Scan in Different Heart Failure Scenarios: Current Applications and Lacks of Evidences.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Bioimpedance Analysis in CKD and HF Patients: A Critical Review of Benefits, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The burden of congestion monitoring in acute decompensated heart failure: The need for multiparametric approach.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Predicting One-Year Mortality after Discharge Using Acute Heart Failure Score (AHFS).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Changing Role of Loop Diuretics in Heart Failure Management across the Last Century.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Role of Congestion Biomarkers in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure and Cava Vein Status in Acute Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Clinical and Prognostic Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Pathophysiology-Based Management of Acute Heart Failure.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Correlations between serum laminin level and severity of heart failure in patients with chronic heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Improve Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Outcomes by Reducing Edema and Congestion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical, Laboratory and Lung Ultrasound Assessment of Congestion in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Sex Differences in the Evaluation of Congestion Markers in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- The interstitial compartment as a therapeutic target in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Non-invasive assessment of acute heart failure by Stevenson classification: Does echocardiographic examination recognize different phenotypes?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although congestion is considered to be the main reason for hospital admission in patients with acute heart failure, a simplistic view considering idro saline retention and total body volume accumulation did not provide convincing data. Clinical congestion occurrence is often the tip of the iceberg of several different mechanisms ranging from increased filling pressure to extravascular fluid accumulation and blood flow redistribution. Therefore, the clinical evaluation is often restricted to a simple physical examination including few and inaccurate signs and symptoms. This superficial approach has led to contradictory data and patients have not been evaluated according to a more realistic clinical scenario. The integration with new diagnostic ultrasonographic and laboratory tools would substantially improve these weaknesses. Indeed, congestion could be assessed by following the most recognized HF subtypes including primitive cardiac defect, presence of right ventricular dysfunction, and organ perfusion. Moreover, there is a tremendous gap regarding the interchangeable concept of fluid retention and redistribution used with a univocal meaning. Overall, congestion assessment should be revised, considering it as either central, peripheral, or both. In this review, we aim to provide different evidence regarding the concept of congestion starting from the most recognized pathophysiological mechanisms of AHF decompensation. We highlight the fact that a better knowledge of congestion is a challenge for future investigation and it could lead to significant advances in HF treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.