Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628564›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2020

Technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal MRI: a consensus project of the Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA.

Iosif Mendichovszky, Pim Pullens, Ilona Dekkers, Fabio Nery, Octavia Bane, Andreas Pohlmann, Anneloes de Boer, Alexandra Ljimani, Aghogho Odudu, Charlotte Buchanan and 13 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Magnetic resonance imaging of renal oxygenation.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. TTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. New Horizons in HyperpolarizedMolecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Renal MRI: From Nephron to NMR Signal.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Iosif MendichovszkyDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Pim PullensDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent Institute for Functional and Metabolic Imaging, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ilona DekkersDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Fabio NeryDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Octavia BaneTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute and Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Andreas PohlmannBerlin Ultrahigh Field Facility, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
Anneloes de BoerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexandra LjimaniDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Aghogho OduduDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Charlotte BuchananSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Kanishka SharmaImaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Christoffer LaustsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, MR Research Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anita HarteveldDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Xavier GolayBrain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Ivan PedrosaDepartment of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
David AlsopDepartment of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sean FainDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Anna CaroliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy.
Pottumarthi PrasadDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced MR Research, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.
Susan FrancisSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Eric SigmundDepartment of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Maria Fernández-SearaDepartment of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Steven SourbronImaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. s.sourbron@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center SPORE in Kidney CancerP50CA196516 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Brugarolas · 2016 to 2026
$24.7M
NON-INVASIVE PHYSIOLOGIC PREDICTORS OF AGGRESSIVENESS IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMAR01CA154475 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PEDROSA, IVAN · 2011 to 2024
$4.3M
Quantitative Non-Contrast Perfusion using Arterial Spin Labeling for Assessment of Cancer Therapy ResponseU01CA207091 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MADHURANTHAKAM, ANANTH J, MALDJIAN, JOSEPH A · 2017 to 2022
$3.1M
European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA16103Medical Research Council MR/R02264X/1NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154475NCI NIH HHS U01 CA207091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe potential of renal MRI biomarkers has been increasingly recognised, but clinical translation requires more standardisation. The PARENCHIMA consensus project aims to develop and apply a process for generating technical recommendations on renal MRI.

methodsA task force was formed in July 2018 focused on five methods. A draft process for attaining consensus was distributed publicly for consultation and finalised at an open meeting (Prague, October 2018). Four expert panels completed surveys between October 2018 and March 2019, discussed results and refined the surveys at a face-to-face meeting (Aarhus, March 2019) and completed a second round (May 2019).

resultsA seven-stage process was defined: (1) formation of expert panels; (2) definition of the context of use; (3) literature review; (4) collection and comparison of MRI protocols; (5) consensus generation by an approximate Delphi method; (6) reporting of results in vendor-neutral and vendor-specific terms; (7) ongoing review and updating. Application of the process resulted in 166 consensus statements.

conclusionThe process generated meaningful technical recommendations across very different MRI methods, while allowing for improvement and refinement as open issues are resolved. The results are likely to be widely supported by the renal MRI community and thereby promote more harmonisation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDelphi TechniqueEuropeExpert TestimonyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNephrologyReference StandardsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited StatesBiomarkersBiomarkersConsensusImagingKidneyStandardisation

Identifiers

PMID31628564
PMCPMC7021737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.