Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628531›Full record

ReviewHNO2020

[Hearing and cognition: neurocognitive test batteries in otorhinolaryngology].

C Völter, L Götze, U Bruene-Cohrs, S Dazert, J P Thomas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [How the brain perceives the world in old age with all senses].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C VölterKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland. christiane.voelter@rub.de.
L GötzeKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland.
U Bruene-CohrsKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum, Alexandrinentrasse 1, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
S DazertKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland.
J P ThomasKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHearing and cognition are closely related to each other. Particularly in suboptimal listening situations, cognitive abilities become important to enable speech comprehension. Besides, studies have indicated that hearing impairment is associated with a more rapid mental decline compared to persons with normal hearing. However, hearing loss also has an impact on neurocognitive testing, which is generally based on auditive stimuli. With increasing age, the risk of sensory but also of cognitive impairments increases. So far this comorbidity receives little consideration in otorhinolaryngology. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe paper presents an overview and evaluation of widely used German neurocognitive test batteries for older patients, with regard to the different test modalities and their focus.

resultsA multitude of different neurocognitive screening tests and detailed test batteries are available, particularly in the field of dementia. So far, sensory deficits have not been considered in neurocognitive testing, neither concerning application nor interpretation. Normative data adapted to the hearing impaired are still missing.

conclusionWith regard to demographic changes and the well-known bias between hearing and cognition, screening of neurocognitive functions should be implemented in basic otorhinolaryngologic diagnostics. More comprehensive test batteries might be useful for research purposes or speech therapy.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersHearing DisordersHearing TestsOtolaryngologyCognitionHearingHumansMental Status and Dementia TestsCognitive dysfunctionDementiaHearing impairmentNeuropsychological testsPresbyacusis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.