ReviewHNO2019
[Salivary gland malignancies-highlights of the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting].
Review in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Rare Diseases of the Salivary Glands and of Facial Nerve.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2021Article
- [Tumor microenvironment in salivary gland carcinomas: Consequences for new therapeutic concepts].HNO · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to their comparatively low incidence, salivary gland carcinomas have only been the subject of isolated clinical studies in recent years. In addition, surgery with/without adjuvant radiotherapy is considered standard treatment. Systemic therapies have received little attention and are only used for advanced and distantly metastasized salivary gland malignancies.
objectiveThe contributions with the highest relevance for this year's meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) were to be reviewed. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 12 contributions pertaining to clinical studies on salivary gland malignancies were identified, eight of which were classified as relevant for future changes to the therapeutic landscape.
resultsThree studies dealt with different combinations of a checkpoint blockade, and each showed a low response rate. In addition, studies on targeted therapies depending on the results of a mutation analysis and expression of HER2 or the androgen receptor were presented.
conclusionA favorable response of HER2-positive salivary gland carcinomas to an antibody-drug conjugate could be shown. Furthermore, no convincing data regarding response to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced salivary gland cancer were presented. Further studies and ideas for new treatment approaches will be needed to improve the therapeutic options for patients with salivary gland carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.