ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019
Reconstruction of composite leg defects post-war injury.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conflicts, military medicine and war casualties in international Orthopaedics.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Vascularised Fibula Transfer for Post-traumatic Critical Tibial Bone Defects: A Systematic Review.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a high conflict region, war injuries to the distal lower extremity are a major source of large composite defects involving bone and soft tissues. These defects are at the edge between using a single free flap [osteo-(+/-myo) cutaneous] vs double free flap reconstruction (bone and soft tissue). In this paper, we present our experience and outcomes in treating patients with leg war injury reconstructed using a single free fibula flap.
methodsFifteen patients with distal leg composite defects secondary to war injuries were treated between January 2015 and March 2016. All patients were reconstructed using single barrel free fibula osteo-(+/-myo)cutaneous flap where single or double skin paddles were used according to the soft tissue defect requiring coverage.
resultsThere were no cases of total or partial flap loss. Complications were limited to three cases including traumatic fibula fracture, venous congestion with negative findings, and residual soft tissue defect requiring coverage. There were no cases of wound dehiscence or infection. Mean follow-up time was 418.8 days. Mean bone healing time was nine months after which patients were allowed full weight bearing.
conclusionA single barrel free fibula osteo-(+/-myo)cutaneous flap is a valid and reliable tool for reconstruction composite lower extremity defects post-war injury. Adequate planning of fibula flap soft tissue components (skin, muscle) rearrangement is essential for success in such challenging reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31628516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.