Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628488›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2020

Functional cross talk between the Fanconi anemia and ATRX/DAXX histone chaperone pathways promotes replication fork recovery.

Maya Raghunandan, Jung Eun Yeo, Ryan Walter, Kai Saito, Adam J Harvey, Stacie Ittershagen, Eun-A Lee, Jihyeon Yang, Maureen E Hoatlin, Anja K Bielinsky and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. ATRX: From Chromatin Remodeling to Disease.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maya RaghunandanDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jung Eun YeoCenter for Genomic Integrity (CGI), Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Ryan WalterDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kai SaitoDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Adam J HarveyDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Stacie IttershagenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Eun-A LeeCenter for Genomic Integrity (CGI), Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Jihyeon YangCenter for Genomic Integrity (CGI), Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Maureen E HoatlinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Anja K BielinskyDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Eric A HendricksonDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Orlando SchärerCenter for Genomic Integrity (CGI), Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Alexandra SobeckDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · USInstitute for Basic Science · KROregon Health & Science University · USUlsan National Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

Understanding the biological function of Mcm10 in yeastR01GM074917 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BIELINSKY, ANJA-KATRIN · 2005 to 2019
$3.7M
The mechanism of Cas9/CRISPR-initiated genome modification in human somatic cellsR01GM088351 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2010 to 2018
$2.3M
Ligase III regulates survival from crisis induced by gradual telomere shorteningR01CA190492 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Functional Analysis of the Fanconi PathwayR01CA112775 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HOATLIN, MAUREEN E · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
Role of EMSY protein complexes in the FA DNA repair pathwayR21CA194871 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SOBECK, ALEXANDRA THERESIA · 2016 to 2017
$358k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112775NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190492NCI NIH HHS R21 CA194871NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074917NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a chromosome instability syndrome characterized by increased cancer predisposition. Specifically, the FA pathway functions to protect genome stability during DNA replication. The central FA pathway protein, FANCD2, locates to stalled replication forks and recruits homologous recombination (HR) factors such as CtBP interacting protein (CtIP) to promote replication fork restart while suppressing new origin firing. Here, we identify alpha-thalassemia retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) as a novel physical and functional interaction partner of FANCD2. ATRX is a chromatin remodeler that forms a complex with Death domain-associated protein 6 (DAXX) to deposit the histone variant H3.3 into specific genomic regions. Intriguingly, ATRX was recently implicated in replication fork recovery; however, the underlying mechanism(s) remained incompletely understood. Our findings demonstrate that ATRX forms a constitutive protein complex with FANCD2 and protects FANCD2 from proteasomal degradation. ATRX and FANCD2 localize to stalled replication forks where they cooperate to recruit CtIP and promote MRE11 exonuclease-dependent fork restart while suppressing the firing of new replication origins. Remarkably, replication restart requires the concerted histone H3 chaperone activities of ATRX/DAXX and FANCD2, demonstrating that coordinated histone H3 variant deposition is a crucial event during the reinitiation of replicative DNA synthesis. Lastly, ATRX also cooperates with FANCD2 to promote the HR-dependent repair of directly induced DNA double-stranded breaks. We propose that ATRX is a novel functional partner of FANCD2 to promote histone deposition-dependent HR mechanisms in S-phase.

Indexed as

Cell LineChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyCo-Repressor ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDNA ReplicationFanconi AnemiaFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinGene Knockout TechniquesHistonesHumansMolecular ChaperonesMRE11 Homologue ProteinRad51 RecombinaseRecombinational DNA RepairATRX protein, humanChromatinCo-Repressor ProteinsDAXX protein, humanFANCD2 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinHistonesMolecular ChaperonesMRE11 Homologue ProteinRad51 RecombinaseX-linked Nuclear Protein

Identifiers

PMID31628488
PMCPMC7206856
OpenAlexW2981159647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.