Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628445›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

V2a interneuron differentiation from mouse and human pluripotent stem cells.

Jessica C Butts, Nisha Iyer, Nick White, Russell Thompson, Shelly Sakiyama-Elbert, Todd C McDevitt

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuroplasticity and regeneration after spinal cord injury.North American Spine Society journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cell transplantation to repair the injured spinal cord.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Bioengineering the human spinal cord.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Spinal Interneurons as Gatekeepers to Neuroplasticity after Injury or Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica C ButtsGladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nisha IyerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Nick WhiteDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Russell ThompsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Shelly Sakiyama-ElbertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. sakiyama@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4832-5851
Todd C McDevittGladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, USA. Todd.mcdevitt@gladstone.ucsf.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USGladstone Institutes · USQB3 · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

DEVELOPING NEW TOOLS TO UNDERSTAND THE ROLE OF INTERNEURONS IN REWIRING AFTER SPINAL CORD INJURY.R01NS090617 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SAKIYAMA-ELBERT, SHELLY ELESE · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Elucidating the molecular basis of Atoh1 lineage diversity in the developing hindbrainF32NS117723 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BUTTS, JESSICA CHRISTINE · 2020 to 2021
$105k
Evaluating the role of excitatory interneurons for regeneration after spinal cord injury using in vitro and in vivo transgenic modelsF31NS090760 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI IYER, NISHA · 2014 to 2016
$58k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS090760NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS117723NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

V2a interneurons are located in the hindbrain and spinal cord, where they provide rhythmic input to major motor control centers. Many of the phenotypic properties and functions of excitatory V2a interneurons have yet to be fully defined. Definition of these properties could lead to novel regenerative therapies for traumatic injuries and drug targets for chronic degenerative diseases. Here we describe how to produce V2a interneurons from mouse and human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), as well as strategies to characterize and mature the cells for further analysis. The described protocols are based on a sequence of small-molecule treatments that induce differentiation of PSCs into V2a interneurons. We also include a detailed description of how to phenotypically characterize, mature, and freeze the cells. The mouse and human protocols are similar in regard to the sequence of small molecules used but differ slightly in the concentrations and durations necessary for induction. With the protocols described, scientists can expect to obtain V2a interneurons with purities of ~75% (mouse) in 7 d and ~50% (human) in 20 d.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell LineHumansInterneuronsMicePluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID31628445
PMCPMC7243683
OpenAlexW2980767952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.