Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628409›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2019

Accuracy of proton magnetic resonance for diagnosing non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a meta-analysis.

Tae-Hoon Kim, Chang-Won Jeong, Hong Young Jun, ChungSub Lee, SiHyeong Noh, Ji Eon Kim, SeungJin Kim, Kwon-Ha Yoon

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. NAFLD in type 1 diabetes: overrated or underappreciated?Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. [Characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for chronic hepatitis B combined with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tae-Hoon KimMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-0665
Chang-Won JeongMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-4686
Hong Young JunMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.
ChungSub LeeMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.
SiHyeong NohMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.
Ji Eon KimMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.
SeungJin KimMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.
Kwon-Ha YoonMedical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea. khy1646@wku.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2634-8510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver biopsy is the reference standard test to differentiate between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and simple steatosis (SS) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but noninvasive diagnostics are warranted. The diagnostic accuracy in NASH using MR imaging modality have not yet been clearly identified. This study was assessed the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method for diagnosing NASH. Data were extracted from research articles obtained after a literature search from multiple electronic databases. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain overall effect size of the area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios(LR), diagnostic odds ratio(DOR) of MRI method in detecting histopathologically-proven SS(or non-NASH) and NASH. Seven studies were analyzed 485 patients, which included 207 SS and 278 NASH. The pooled sensitivity was 87.4% (95% CI, 76.4-95.3) and specificity was 74.3% (95% CI, 62.4-84.6). Pooled positive LR was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.96-3.42) and negative LR was 0.17 (95% CI, 0.07-0.38). DOR was 21.57 (95% CI, 7.27-63.99). The area under the curve of summary ROC was 0.89. Our meta-analysis shows that the MRI-based diagnostic methods are valuable additions in detecting NASH.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyAdultAgedFemaleHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseOdds RatioROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31628409
PMCPMC6802098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.