Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628408›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Evaluation of Small Molecule Drug Uptake in Patient-Derived Prostate Cancer Explants by Mass Spectrometry.

Shadrack M Mutuku, Paul J Trim, Bala K Prabhala, Swati Irani, Kayla L Bremert, Jessica M Logan, Douglas A Brooks, Jürgen Stahl, Margaret M Centenera, Marten F Snel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Spatial MS multiomics on clinical prostate cancer tissues.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shadrack M MutukuAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Paul J TrimSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Bala K PrabhalaSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Swati IraniAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Kayla L BremertAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Jessica M LoganMechanisms in Cell Biology and Disease Research Group, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Douglas A BrooksMechanisms in Cell Biology and Disease Research Group, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Jürgen StahlClinpath Laboratories, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Margaret M CenteneraAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Marten F SnelSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Lisa M ButlerAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. lisa.butler@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-3220
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived explant (PDE) culture of solid tumors is increasingly being applied to preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutics and for biomarker discovery. In this technique, treatments are added to culture medium and penetrate the tissue via a gelatin sponge scaffold. However, the penetration profile and final concentrations of small molecule drugs achieved have not been determined to date. Here, we determined the extent of absorption of the clinical androgen receptor antagonist, enzalutamide, into prostate PDEs, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and matrix-assisted laser/desorption ionisation (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI). In a cohort of 11 PDE tissues from eight individual patients, LC-MS/MS quantification of PDE homogenates confirmed enzalutamide (10 µM) uptake by all PDEs, which reached maximal average tissue concentration of 0.24-0.50 ng/µg protein after 48 h culture. Time dependent uptake of enzalutamide (50 µM) in PDEs was visualized using MALDI MSI over 24-48 h, with complete penetration throughout tissues evident by 6 h of culture. Drug signal intensity was not homogeneous throughout the tissues but had areas of markedly high signal that corresponded to drug target (androgen receptor)-rich epithelial regions of tissue. In conclusion, application of MS-based drug quantification and visualization in PDEs, and potentially other 3-dimensional model systems, can provide a more robust basis for experimental study design and interpretation of pharmacodynamic data.

Indexed as

Absorption, PhysicochemicalAgedAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesCells, CulturedChromatography, LiquidCohort StudiesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic NeoplasmsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoin

Identifiers

PMID31628408
PMCPMC6802206
OpenAlexW2980561120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.