Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Specific effects of antitumor active norspermidine on the structure and function of DNA.

Takashi Nishio, Yuko Yoshikawa, Chwen-Yang Shew, Naoki Umezawa, Tsunehiko Higuchi, Kenichi Yoshikawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatial-Temporal Genome Regulation in Stress-Response and Cell-Fate Change.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Nucleosome destabilization by polyamines.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Takashi NishioFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, 610-0394, Japan.
Yuko YoshikawaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, 610-0394, Japan.
Chwen-Yang ShewDoctoral Program in Chemistry, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, 10016, USA. ChwenYang.Shew@csi.cuny.edu.
Naoki UmezawaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan.
Tsunehiko HiguchiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan.
Kenichi YoshikawaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, 610-0394, Japan. keyoshik@mail.doshisha.ac.jp.
Doshisha University · JPNagoya City University · JPThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the effects of trivalent polyamines, spermidine (SPD) and norspermidine (NSPD), a chemical homologue of SPD, on the structure of DNA and gene expression. The chemical structures of SPD and NSPD are different only with the number of methylene groups between amine groups, [N-3-N-4-N] and [N-3-N-3-N], respectively. SPD plays vital roles in cell function and survival, including in mammals. On the other hand, NSPD has antitumor activity and is found in some species of plants, bacteria and algae, but not in humans. We found that both polyamines exhibit biphasic effect; enhancement and inhibition on in vitro gene expression, where SPD shows definitely higher potency in enhancement but NSPD causes stronger inhibition. Based on the results of AFM (atomic force microscopy) observations together with single DNA measurements with fluorescence microscopy, it becomes clear that SPD tends to align DNA orientation, whereas NSPD induces shrinkage with a greater potency. The measurement of binding equilibrium by NMR indicates that NSPD shows 4-5 times higher affinity to DNA than SPD. Our theoretical study with Monte Carlo simulation provides the insights into the underlying mechanism of the specific effect of NSPD on DNA.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDNAGene ExpressionMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMicroscopy, FluorescenceNucleic Acid ConformationPlasmidsSpermidineAntineoplastic AgentsDNAnorspermidineSpermidine

Identifiers

PMID31628357
PMCPMC6802174
OpenAlexW2980913837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.