Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31628346›Full record

ReviewNature communications2019

The importance of Antarctic krill in biogeochemical cycles.

E L Cavan, A Belcher, A Atkinson, S L Hill, S Kawaguchi, S McCormack, B Meyer, S Nicol, L Ratnarajah, K Schmidt and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adjusting the management of the Antarctic krill fishery to meet the challenges of the 21st century.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

E L CavanInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. e.cavan@imperial.ac.uk.
A BelcherBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9583-5910
A AtkinsonPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5931-4325
S L HillBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-8769
S KawaguchiAustralian Antarctic Division, Kingston, TAS, Australia.
S McCormackInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-4793
B MeyerAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany.
S NicolInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
L RatnarajahDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
K SchmidtSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
D K SteinbergVirginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
G A TarlingBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
P W BoydInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUBritish Antarctic Survey · GBAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung · DEAustralian Antarctic Division · AUPlymouth Marine Laboratory · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GBWilliam & Mary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) are swarming, oceanic crustaceans, up to two inches long, and best known as prey for whales and penguins - but they have another important role. With their large size, high biomass and daily vertical migrations they transport and transform essential nutrients, stimulate primary productivity and influence the carbon sink. Antarctic krill are also fished by the Southern Ocean's largest fishery. Yet how krill fishing impacts nutrient fertilisation and the carbon sink in the Southern Ocean is poorly understood. Our synthesis shows fishery management should consider the influential biogeochemical role of both adult and larval Antarctic krill.

Indexed as

BiomassFood ChainAnimalsAntarctic RegionsCarbonCarbon CycleEuphausiaceaSeawaterSpheniscidaeWhalesCarbon

Identifiers

PMID31628346
PMCPMC6800442
OpenAlexW2980902248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.