ArticleCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies2019
Rapid development and use of patient-specific ctDNA biomarkers to avoid a "rash decision" in an ovarian cancer patient.
Article in Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Applications and Challenges of Next-Generation Sequencing in Plasma Circulating Tumour DNA of Ovarian Cancer.Biology · 2024Review
- Editorial: Non-invasive Technology Advances in Oncology.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- Non-invasive Technology Advances in Cancer-A Review of the Advances in the Liquid Biopsy for Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the most lethal female reproductive tract malignancy. A major clinical hurdle in patient management and treatment is that when using current surveillance technologies 80% of patients will be clinically diagnosed as having had a complete clinical response to primary therapy. In fact, the majority of women nonetheless develop disease recurrence within 18 mo. Thus, without more accurate surveillance protocols, the diagnostic question regarding OvCa recurrence remains framed as "when" rather than "if." With this background, we describe the case of a 61-yr-old female who presented with a 3-mo history of unexplained whole-body rash, which unexpectedly led to a diagnosis of and her treatment for OvCa. The rash resolved immediately following debulking surgery. Nearly 1 yr later, however, the rash reappeared, prompting the prospect of tumor recurrence and requirement for additional chemotherapy. To investigate this possibility, we undertook a genomics-based tumor surveillance approach using a targeted 56-gene NGS panel and biobanked tumor samples to develop personalized ctDNA biomarkers. Although tumor-specific
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.