ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019
Assessing by Modeling the Consequences of Increased Recombination in Recurrent Selection of
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prioritization of deleterious mutations informs genomic prediction and increases the rate of gain in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), a simulation study.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Optimum recombination rates for genetic gains in simulated recurrent selection in empirical maize populations.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Simulating the impact of recombination rate on genomic selection breeding outcomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- The effect of haplotype size on genomic selection accuracy and epistasis: An empirical study in rice.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Enhanced recombination empowers the detection and mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Exploring impact of recombination landscapes on breeding outcomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Review
- If it ain't broke, don't fix it: evaluating the effect of increased recombination on response to selection for wheat breeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- A Modified Meiotic Recombination inBiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meiotic recombination generates genetic diversity but in most species the number of crossovers per meiosis is limited. Previous modeling studies showed that increasing recombination can enhance response to selection. However, such studies did not assume a specific method of modifying recombination. Our objective was to test whether two methods used to increase recombination in plants could increase genetic gain in a population undergoing recurrent selection such as in genomic selection programs. The first method, in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.