Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31627728›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2019

The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery: a randomized controlled study.

Xue Li, Zhen-Zhen Xu, Xue-Ying Li, Ting-Ting Jiang, Zeng-Mao Lin, Dong-Xin Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Evaluation of Analgesia Effect after Ultrasound-Guided Laparoscopic Renal Surgery.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xue LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Zhen-Zhen XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xue-Ying LiDepartment of Biostatics, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Ting-Ting JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Zeng-Mao LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. linzengmao@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-8063
Dong-Xin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 7 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound-guided lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can provide definite analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall. However, whether this method is useful in renal surgery through the lateral abdominal wall pathway remains unknown. The study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of lateral TAP block for retroperitoneoscopic partial or radical nephrectomy.

methodIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, eligible patients were randomized into two groups. After anaesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided lateral TAP block was performed with either 30 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine (Group T) or an equivalent volume of normal saline (Group C). The primary outcomes were opioid consumption during surgery and in the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postsurgical pain intensity immediately awakening from anaesthesia and at 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, as well as recovery variables including the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sleep quality, time to first ambulation, drainage and length of hospital stay.

resultsA total of 104 patients were enrolled and randomized (53 in Group T and 51 in Group C). Laparoscopic surgery was converted to open surgery in one patient of Group T; this patient was excluded from the outcome analysis. The opioid consumption during surgery (intravenous morphine equivalent dose: median 35.0 mg [interquartile range 18.0, 49.6] in Group C vs. 40.3 mg [20.9, 59.0] in Group T, P = 0.281) and in the first 24 h after surgery (10.8 mg [7.8, 21.7] in Group C vs. 13.2 mg [8.0, 26.6] in Group T, P = 0.311) did not differ significantly between groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the pain intensity at all time points after surgery and the recovery variables (all P > 0.05).

conclusionsOur results showed that, in patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery, preoperative lateral TAP did not decrease intra- and postoperative opioid consumption, nor did it relieve pain intensity or promote postoperative recovery in the first 24 h after surgery. However, the trial might be underpowered.

trial registrationThis study was registered on November 4, 2017, in the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry with the identification number ChiCTR-INR-17013244 .

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyNerve BlockPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRopivacaineAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineAnalgesiaPostsurgical recoveryRetroperitoneoscopic renal surgeryTransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID31627728
PMCPMC6800496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.