Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31627310›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Towards a Portable Model to Discriminate Activity Clusters from Accelerometer Data.

Petra Jones, Evgeny M Mirkes, Tom Yates, Charlotte L Edwardson, Mike Catt, Melanie J Davies, Kamlesh Khunti, Alex V Rowlands

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Petra JonesLeicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. pj100@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-9168
Evgeny M MirkesDepartment of Mathematics, ATT 912, Attenborough Building, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. em322@leicester.ac.uk.
Tom YatesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. ty20@leicester.ac.uk.
Charlotte L EdwardsonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. ce95@leicester.ac.uk.
Mike CattInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK. michael.catt@newcastle.ac.uk.
Melanie J DaviesLeicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. melanie.davies@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.
Kamlesh KhuntiLeicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. kk22@leicester.ac.uk.
Alex V RowlandsDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. alex.rowlands@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1463-697X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few methods for classifying physical activity from accelerometer data have been tested using an independent dataset for cross-validation, and even fewer using multiple independent datasets. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether unsupervised machine learning was a viable approach for the development of a reusable clustering model that was generalisable to independent datasets. We used two labelled adult laboratory datasets to generate a k-means clustering model. To assess its generalised application, we applied the stored clustering model to three independent labelled datasets: two laboratory and one free-living. Based on the development labelled data, the ten clusters were collapsed into four activity categories: sedentary, standing/mixed/slow ambulatory, brisk ambulatory, and running. The percentages of each activity type contained in these categories were 89%, 83%, 78%, and 96%, respectively. In the laboratory independent datasets, the consistency of activity types within the clusters dropped, but remained above 70% for the sedentary clusters, and 85% for the running and ambulatory clusters. Acceleration features were similar within each cluster across samples. The clusters created reflected activity types known to be associated with health and were reasonably robust when applied to diverse independent datasets. This suggests that an unsupervised approach is potentially useful for analysing free-living accelerometer data.

Indexed as

Monitoring, AmbulatoryAccelerationAccelerometryAdultAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisExerciseFemaleHipHumansMaleMotor ActivityWalkingWristaccelerometerclusteringmachine learningphysical activityunsupervisedwalkingwrist-worn

Identifiers

PMID31627310
PMCPMC6832944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.