ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2020
Expansion of Peripheral Visual Field with Novel Virtual Reality Digital Spectacles.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The use of augmented reality and virtual reality for visual field expansion and visual acuity improvement in low vision rehabilitation: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Pooled it
- Topical Review: Impact of Central Vision Loss on Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance while Walking.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2022Pooled it
- Applications of Extended Reality in Ophthalmology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluation of an Augmented-Reality Head-Mounted Display Among Patients With Glaucomatous Tunnel Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma: Benefits and Drawbacks.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- From real world data to real world evidence to improve outcomes in neuro-ophthalmology.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Advanced Visualization Engineering for Vision Disorders: A Clinically Focused Guide to Current Technology and Future Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Usefulness of virtual reality-based training to diagnose strabismus.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Eye-Tracking for Clinical Ophthalmology with Virtual Reality (VR): A Case Study of the HTC Vive Pro Eye's Usability.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: Applications and Challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Mobility improvement of patients with peripheral visual field losses using novel see-through digital spectacles.PloS one · 2020Article
- Review
- Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: A Contemporary Prospective.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine an image remapping method for peripheral visual field (VF) expansion with novel virtual reality digital spectacles (DSpecs) to improve visual awareness in glaucoma patients.
designProspective case series.
methodsMonocular peripheral VF defects were measured and defined with a head-mounted display diagnostic algorithm. The monocular VF was used to calculate remapping parameters with a customized algorithm to relocate and resize unseen peripheral targets within the remaining VF. The sequence of monocular VF was tested and customized image remapping was carried out in 23 patients with typical glaucomatous defects. Test images demonstrating roads and cars were used to determine increased awareness of peripheral hazards while wearing the DSpecs. Patients' scores in identifying and counting peripheral objects with the remapped images were the main outcome measurements.
resultsThe diagnostic monocular VF testing algorithm was comparable to standard automated perimetric determination of threshold sensitivity based on point-by-point assessment. Eighteen of 23 patients (78%) could identify safety hazards with the DSpecs that they could not previously. The ability to identify peripheral objects improved with the use of the DSpecs (P = 0.024, chi-square test). Quantification of the number of peripheral objects improved with the DSpecs (P = 0.0026, Wilcoxon rank sum test).
conclusionsThese novel spectacles may enhance peripheral objects awareness by enlarging the functional field of view in glaucoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.