Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31626732›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2020

Recent Advances in Glycoproteomic Analysis by Mass Spectrometry.

Suttipong Suttapitugsakul, Fangxu Sun, Ronghu Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis Strategy for Identifying theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suttipong SuttapitugsakulSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Fangxu SunSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.
Ronghu WuSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9493-9462

Funding

Effective MS-Based Methods for Unraveling Cell Surface Protein InteractionsR01GM118803 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WU, RONGHU · 2017 to 2024
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsGlycopeptidesGlycoproteinsHumansMass SpectrometryGlycopeptidesGlycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID31626732
PMCPMC7026884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.