Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31626684›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia.

Rita M Traxler, Tsira Napetvaridze, Zviad Asanishvili, Marika Geleishvili, Ketevan Rukhadze, Giorgi Maghlakelidze, Mariam Broladze, Maka Kokhreidze, Edmond F Maes, Debby Reynolds and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Landscape of Anthrax Prevention and Control: Stakeholders' Perceptive in Odisha, India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita M TraxlerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7580-4116
Tsira NapetvaridzeNational Food Agency (NFA) of Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia (MEPA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Zviad AsanishviliNational Food Agency (NFA) of Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia (MEPA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Marika GeleishviliCDC, Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Ketevan RukhadzeDepartment of Rural Development and Vocational Education (DRDVE) of Georgian Institute of Public Affairs (GIPA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Giorgi MaghlakelidzeCDC, Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Mariam BroladzeNational Center for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Maka KokhreidzeLaboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture (LMA), Tbilisi, Georgia.
Edmond F MaesCDC, Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Debby ReynoldsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Mo SalmanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Sean V ShadomyCDC One Health Office, NCEZID, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sangeeta RaoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Center for Global Health · USColorado State University · USNational Environmental Agency · GECenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USGeorgian Institute of Public Affairs · GENational Center for Disease Control and Public Health · GENational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnthrax is endemic in Georgia and recent outbreaks prompted a livestock-handler case-control study with a component to evaluate anthrax knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among livestock handlers or owners.

methodsCases were handlers of livestock with confirmed animal anthrax from June 2013-May 2015. Handlers of four matched unaffected animals were selected as controls, two from the same village as the case animal ("village control") and two from 3-10 km away ("area control"). Descriptive statistics were reported and conditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the magnitude of the association of cases with specific study KAP factors.

resultsCases were more likely male, had lower level college education, less animal care experience, and provided more animal care to their cattle. Cases had lower odds of burying a suddenly dead animal compared to all controls (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% Confidence interval [CI]:0.12, 0.88) and area controls (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.91). On an 8-point knowledge scale, cases having an animal with anthrax had a 1.31 times greater knowledge score compared to all controls (95% CI: 1.03, 1.67). Cases had higher odds of ever having human anthrax or knowing another person who had anthrax compared to all controls (OR: 4.56, 95% CI: 1.45, 14.30) and area controls (OR: 7.16, 95% CI: 1.52, 33.80). DISCUSSION: Cases were more knowledgeable of anthrax and had better anthrax prevention practices, but these are likely a result of the case investigation and ring vaccination following the death of their animal.

conclusionsThe findings reveal a low level of knowledge and practices related to anthrax control and prevention, and will guide educational material development to fill these gaps.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAnimalsAnthraxCase-Control StudiesFemaleGeorgia (Republic)HumansLivestockLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioSurveys and QuestionnairesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID31626684
PMCPMC6799907
OpenAlexW2980351611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.