Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31626653›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Sex-specific differences in risk factors of lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer.

Eun Sook Ryu, Seung Jun Chang, Jungsuk An, Jun-Young Yang, Jun-Won Chung, Yoon Jae Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang An Kwon, Seungyoon Nam and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Sook RyuCollege of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Seung Jun ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jungsuk AnDepartment of Pathology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Young YangDepartment of Life Sciences, Gachon Advanced Institute of Health Sciences & Technology, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Won ChungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Jae KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Oh KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Dong Kyun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kwang An KwonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Seungyoon NamCollege of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Woon Kee LeeDepartment of Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jung Ho KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6944-473X
Gachon University · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of lymph node status is of crucial importance in the appropriate treatment planning for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Some studies have examined factors predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC; however, these studies did not consider sex-specific differences. This study aimed to investigate sex-specific differences in predictive risk factors of LNM in EGC based on surgical specimens. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for EGC between January 2003 and February 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent previous gastric surgery or treatment for gastric neoplasms were excluded. Finally, 1076 patients treated for EGC were included in the analysis. We analyzed risk factors of LNM by dividing patients into male and female groups. Of 1076 patients (mean age 59.6 years), 69% were men. The overall LNM rate was 9.4%. The LNM rate was lower in men (7.8%) than in women (12.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that elevated type (odds ratio [OR], 2.084; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.053-4.125; P = 0.035), submucosal invasion (OR, 2.162; 95% CI: 1.018-4.595; P = 0.045), undifferentiated type (OR, 2.044; 95% CI: 1.107-3.772; P = 0.022), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR, 7.210; 95% CI: 3.835-13.554; P<0.001) were independent predictive risk factors of LNM in EGC in men. However, only submucosal invasion (OR, 8.772; 95% CI: 2.823-27.259; P<0.001) and LVI (OR, 8.877; 95% CI: 3.861-20.410; P<0.001) were independent predictive risk factors of LNM in EGC in women. Submucosal invasion and LVI were risk factors of LNM in both men and women. However, elevated and undifferentiated types were risk factors in men but not in women. Clinicians should consider these sex-specific differences with regard to individualized management.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisAgedFemaleGastric MucosaHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31626653
PMCPMC6799917
OpenAlexW2980434127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.