Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31626648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The uptake of the pharmacy-dispensed naloxone kit program in Ontario: A population-based study.

Beatrice Choremis, Tonya Campbell, Mina Tadrous, Diana Martins, Tony Antoniou, Tara Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical outcomes and health care costs among people entering a safer opioid supply program in Ontario.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Canadian national consensus guidelines for naloxone prescribing by pharmacists.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  16. The status of naloxone in community pharmacies across Canada.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Frequently asked questions about naloxone: Part 1.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  19. The opioid crisis: Naloxone and pharmacists to the rescue.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beatrice ChoremisQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Tonya CampbellICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diana MartinsKeenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tony AntoniouICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara GomesICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-1965

Funding

CIHR 153070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNaloxone is a life-saving antidote for opioid overdoses. In June 2016, the Ontario government implemented the Ontario Naloxone Program for Pharmacies (ONPP) to enhance access to naloxone.

objectiveWe examined the initial uptake of naloxone through the ONPP and characteristics of the individuals receiving and pharmacies dispensing naloxone kits.

methodsWe conducted a population-based study of all Ontario residents who received a naloxone kit between July 1, 2016 and March 31, 2018. This involved 1) a cross-sectional analysis of monthly rates of kits dispensed; and 2) a descriptive analysis of all individuals and pharmacies who accessed and dispensed naloxone, respectively. We stratified individuals according to their opioid exposure as: prescription opioid agonist therapy (OAT) recipients, prescription opioid recipients, those with past opioid exposure and those with no/unknown opioid exposure. We calculated a Lorenz curve comparing the cumulative percent of naloxone-dispensing pharmacies and cumulative percent of naloxone kits dispensed and the corresponding Gini coefficient.

resultsNaloxone dispensing through the ONPP increased considerably from 1.9 to 54.3 kits per 100,000 residents over the study period. In this time, 2,729 community pharmacies dispensed 91,069 kits to 67,910 unique individuals. Uptake was highest among prescription OAT recipients (40.7% of OAT recipients dispensed at least one kit), compared with 1.6% of prescription opioid recipients, 1.0% of those with past opioid exposure and 0.3% with no/unknown opioid exposure. Naloxone dispensing was highly clustered among pharmacies (Gini = 0.78), with 55.6% of Ontario pharmacies dispensing naloxone, and one-third (33.7%) of kits dispensed by the top 1.0% of naloxone-dispensing pharmacies.

conclusionThe ONPP launch led to a rapid increase in the number of naloxone kits dispensed in Ontario. Although the program successfully engaged people prescribed OAT, efforts to increase uptake among others at risk of opioid overdose appear warranted. Opportunities for expanding pharmacy participation should be identified and pursued.

Indexed as

Government ProgramsPharmaciesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOntarioPopulation SurveillanceNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID31626648
PMCPMC6799925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.