ArticlePsycho-oncology2020
Development and usability testing of the e-EXCELS tool to guide cancer survivorship follow-up care.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of eHealth interventions in long-term follow-up care for breast and gynecological cancer survivors: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Meaningful consumer involvement in cancer care: a systematic review on co-design methods and processes.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Pooled it
- User-Centered Design for Digital Patient-Navigation Tools in Oncology: Scoping Review.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Article
- Usability and Usefulness of a Symptom Management Coaching System for Patients With Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- eHealth interventions to support colorectal cancer patients' self-management after discharge from surgery-an integrative literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Review
- Identification of the Needs and Preferences of Patients With Cancer for the Development of a Clinic App: Qualitative Study.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- The Development of a Video-based Nutrition Education Curriculum for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- User-Centered Development and Patient Acceptability Testing of a Health-Coaching Intervention to Enhance Cancer Survivorship Follow-up in Primary Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2022Article
- Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Post-Treatment Surveillance Patterns of Care: A SEER- Medicare Study.Advanced research in gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Article
- [Apps and web-based interventions for prostate cancer follow-up-a scoping review].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021Article
- eHealth Practices in Cancer Survivors With BMI in Overweight or Obese Categories: Latent Class Analysis Study.JMIR cancer · 2020Article
- Review
- Clinical Preventive Services and Self-Management Practices Among Adult Cancer Survivors in the United States Over Time.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to describe a user-centered (e.g., cancer survivors and clinicians) development process of an eHealth tool designed to facilitate self-management of cancer survivorship follow-up care.
methodsGuided by Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) model and informed by core self-management skills, we engaged in a user-centered design process. In phase I, we conducted in-depth interviews with survivors of breast (n = 33), prostate (n = 4), and colorectal (n = 6) cancers, and (n = 9) primary care providers to develop content and design of the web tool. Phase II utilized iterative user testing interviews (n = 9) to test the web-based tool prototype. Data from both phases were independently coded using a template/content analytic approach.
resultsThe top 5 functions identified in phase I for the web-based platform included: (a) educational materials to learn and prepare for health encounters (80%); (b) questions for health providers (74%); (c) ability to track contact information of providers (67%); (d) provide general information (64%); and, (e) support information (62%). Users of the prototype reported patient burden, tool fatigue, introduction timing of the tool, relevance, and security/privacy as concerns in phase II.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the value of using a theoretically informed and user-centered design process to develop relevant and patient-centered eHealth resources to support cancer survivorship. A larger study is needed to establish the efficacy of this eHealth tool as an intervention to improve adherence to follow-up care guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.