Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31626302›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2020

Tissue-Engineered Bone Tumor as a Reproducible Human in Vitro Model for Studies of Anticancer Drugs.

Courtney Sakolish, John S House, Alan Chramiec, Yizhong Liu, Zunwei Chen, Susan P Halligan, Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, Ivan Rusyn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Exploring bone-tumor interactions through 3DJournal of bone oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microphysiological Systems Evaluation: Experience of TEX-VAL Tissue Chip Testing Consortium.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Microphysiological systems: What it takes for community adoption.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Courtney SakolishDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843.
John S HouseBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695.
Alan ChramiecDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Yizhong LiuDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843.
Zunwei ChenDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843.
Susan P HalliganDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Gordana Vunjak-NovakovicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Ivan RusynDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843.
Texas A&M University · USColumbia University · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Tissue Engineering Resource Center: TTDP41EB027062 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic · 2019 to 2026
$12.6M
TRAINING IN CELLULAR, MOLECULAR AND BIOPHYSICAL STUDIEST32GM008224 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI LIEM, RONALD K. · 1987 to 2021
$9.9M
Craniofacial Tissue EngineeringR01DE016525 · NIDCR · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC, GORDANA · 2005 to 2017
$5.5M
TEX-VAL: Texas A&M Tissue Chip Validation CenterU24TR001950 · NCATS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI RUSYN, IVAN · 2016 to 2017
$4.2M
Multi-tissue platform for modeling systemic pathologiesUH3EB025765 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC, GORDANA · 2019 to 2021
$4.0M
Regulatory Science in Environmental Health and ToxicologyT32ES026568 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu, Natalie M Johnson · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
Multi-tissue platform for modeling systemic pathologiesUG3EB025765 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC, GORDANA · 2017 to 2019
$2.8M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR001950NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027062NIBIB NIH HHS UG3 EB025765NIBIB NIH HHS UH3 EB025765NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016525NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES026568NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of anticancer therapies in traditional cell culture models can demonstrate efficacy of direct-acting compounds but lack the 3-dimensional arrangement of the tumor cells and their tissue-specific microenvironments, both of which are important modulators of treatment effects in vivo. Bone cells reside in complex environments that regulate their fate and function. A bioengineered human bone-tumor model has been shown to provide a microphysiological niche for studies of cancer cell behavior. Here, we demonstrate successful transfer between 2 laboratories and utility of this model in efficacy studies using well-established chemotherapeutic agents. The bioengineered human bone-tumor model consisted of Ewing sarcoma (RD-ES) cancer cell aggregates infused into tissue-engineered bone that was grown from human mesenchymal stem cell-derived differentiated into osteoblasts within mineralized bone scaffolds. The tumor model was maintained in culture for over 5 weeks and subjected to clinically relevant doses of linsitinib, doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate, vincristine, dexamethasone, or MAP (methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination). Drug administration cycles were designed to mimic clinical treatment regimens. The bioengineered tumors were evaluated days to weeks after the cessation of treatment to monitor the potential for relapse, using bioengineered bone and ES cell monolayers as controls. Drug binding to the scaffolds and media proteins and gene expression were also evaluated. We show that a bioengineered human bone tumor can be used as a microphysiological model for preclinical studies of anticancer drugs. We found that anticancer efficacy was achieved at concentrations approximating the human Cmax, in contrast to traditional ES cell monolayers. These studies show that the bone-tumor model can be successfully transferred between laboratories and has predictive power in preclinical studies. The effects of drugs on the bone tumors and healthy bone were studied in parallel, in support of the utility of this model for identification of new therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCisplatinDoxorubicinHumansImidazolesOsteoblastsPyrazinesSarcoma, EwingTissue EngineeringTumor MicroenvironmentVincristine3-(8-amino-1-(2-phenylquinolin-7-yl)imidazo(1,5-a)pyrazin-3-yl)-1-methylcyclobutanolAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDoxorubicinImidazolesPyrazinesVincristinealternatives to animal testing < in vitro and alternativesbone < systems toxicologysafety evaluationtissue chiptoxicogenomics < methods

Identifiers

PMID31626302
PMCPMC8204946
OpenAlexW2980649413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.