ArticleMedicine2019
Are parents' statements reliable for diagnosis of serious bacterial infection among children with fever without an apparent source?: A retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding parents' decisions to seek care for children with serious bacterial infections: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Management of acute fever in children: Consensus recommendations for community and primary healthcare providers in sub-Saharan Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2021Review
- Parental assessment of disease severity in febrile children under 5 years of age: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Distinguishing SBI from self-limiting viral infections is a very important task in the emergency department (ED), especially in the children with fever without source (FWS). The aim of this study was to analyze whether parents' statements about clinical manifestations, which were categorized according to grades, are related to the actual diagnosis of SBI in children with FWS.Retrospective analysis was conducted using prospectively acquired cohort data for all febrile children in the pediatric ED of Seoul National University Hospital from August 2016 to August 2017. The association of clinical manifestations and SBI was the main outcome of this study. The SBIs included diagnoses such as bacteremia, bacterial meningitis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia. Clinical manifestations including activity, urination, and feeding were categorized into 3 or 4 grades according to the parents' statements. The linear-by-linear association test was used to examine linear associations between the severity of clinical manifestations and SBI. Receiver operating characteristic curves for clinical manifestations were constructed for patients with SBI. Area under the curve (AUC) statistics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained to evaluate the predictive performance of clinical manifestations.There was no linear association between SBI and non-SBI when compared by severity of the clinical manifestations, such as duration of fever (P = .299), activity (P = .781), feeding (P = .161), and urination (P = .834). The AUC was 0.54 (95% CI 0.41-0.67) for duration of fever, 0.52 for activity (95% CI 0.40-0.64), 0.42 for feeding (95% CI 0.32-0.53), and 0.51 for urination (95% CI 0.39-0.62).There was no evidence that the test performance of the clinical manifestations is valid for predicting SBIs, even considering the severity of manifestations. For optimal evaluation of the children with FWS, more comprehensive approach including laboratory tests, are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.